An illustrated taxonomy of queerness and mental… | Little White Lies

Queer Cinema

An illus­trat­ed tax­on­o­my of queer­ness and men­tal ill­ness in film

29 Apr 2017

Words by Ruby Tandoh

Vibrant abstract face with distorted features, bold colours of red, blue, and yellow, chaotic and striking composition.
Vibrant abstract face with distorted features, bold colours of red, blue, and yellow, chaotic and striking composition.
In this extract from her new zine Do What You Want’, Ruby Tan­doh looks at how men­tal­ly ill and LGBTQ peo­ple are rep­re­sent­ed on screen.

We all like to see peo­ple like us on screen. Cin­e­ma can show us any life, any­where, in any real­i­ty. Dis­tant worlds become tan­gi­ble, and the impos­si­ble stretch­es wide before our eyes, but it’s often the small­er sto­ries that most res­onate with us. We feel the pull towards films with plots that run par­al­lel to our own, with char­ac­ters in whose foot­steps we can follow.

Because the world of cin­e­ma is so huge and so reliant on cap­i­tal, and priv­i­leged struc­tures of pro­mo­tion and dis­tri­b­u­tion, films don’t always show us sto­ries as diverse as the peo­ple who watch them, though. Dom­i­nant nar­ra­tives tend to be white, straight, cis­gen­der and good-look­ing, and many of us don’t see our­selves on screen until the film cred­its have fin­ished and we glimpse our­selves dim and hazy in the black mir­ror of the dor­mant TV.

If you’re men­tal­ly ill and LGBTQ, this lack is par­tic­u­lar­ly clear, but there’s also a strange dis­tor­tion at play. Queer peo­ple are wild­ly under­rep­re­sent­ed on screen; so too are men­tal­ly unwell peo­ple. And yet at the inter­sec­tion of queer and men­tal­ly ill, we find a set of thriv­ing cin­e­ma stereo­types that resur­face time and time again, across eras, gen­res and styles. The trope of the crazy queer’ is one that sits just as cen­tral to cin­e­mat­ic his­to­ry as the gut­sy ingénue or the mis­un­der­stood-but-valiant out­sider nerd.

It’s a warp­ing of our expe­ri­ences, and one that sel­dom does jus­tice to the real­i­ties of what it is to be a men­tal­ly ill per­son in the LGBTQ com­mu­ni­ty. Here is an illus­trat­ed tax­on­o­my of men­tal­ly ill queer (or queer cod­ed) char­ac­ters on screen – the good, the bad and the ugly.

Vibrant abstract art with swirling, kaleidoscopic shapes and patterns in shades of pink, blue, yellow, and black.

I was gid­dy with excite­ment when I first saw Cru­el Inten­tions, and of course I lin­gered longer than I maybe should have done on the scene where Sarah Michelle Gellar’s schem­ing, socio­path­ic Kathryn seduces hap­less ingénue Cecile. This lux­u­ri­ant, amoral, wicked world of rich New York teens, inter­rupt­ed with flash­es of queer­ness, was every­thing that was sup­posed to be awful with the world. I loved it.

This trope of sin­gle-mind­ed­ly das­tard­ly queer women is one that reach­es its gnarly fin­gers out far beyond just sexy teen dra­mas, though. Look at Peter Jackson’s 1994 psy­cho­log­i­cal thriller Heav­en­ly Crea­tures, where Kate Winslet and Melanie Lynskey’s intense, queer-cod­ed friend­ship leads them to cold-blood­ed mur­der, in a reimag­in­ing of an infa­mous real-life crime. Mon­ster also draws inspi­ra­tion from true crime in its por­tray­al of ser­i­al killer Aileen Wuornos, show­ing the men­tal ill­ness and trau­ma that sent Aileen spi­ralling towards fatal brutality.

If Mon­ster is a film that hints at the human­i­ty of its sub­ject, then Basic Instinct pro­vides the blue­print for the exact oppo­site: the queer woman mur­der­er, whose cod­ed psy­chopa­thy man­i­fests as a kind of seduc­tive femme fatale car­i­ca­ture. While Sharon Stone’s char­ac­ter famous­ly wears no pants in one noto­ri­ous scene, her on-screen girl­friend rep­re­sents a dif­fer­ent kind of queer­ness: the aggres­sive, gut­sy foil to Stone’s sex-led sly­ness. Their rela­tion­ship is tem­pes­tu­ous; their sex­u­al­i­ty is fraught. Pre­dictably, it’s men who suf­fer their wrath.

But don’t give up on your crime-filled queer dreams just yet! In queer clas­sic Bound, we see a hearti­er alter­na­tive to these stereo­types. Direct­ed by the trans­gen­der Wachows­ki sis­ters (who went on to direct The Matrix tril­o­gy), it’s a sul­try neo-noir thriller that puts a same-gen­der rela­tion­ship at the heart of an organ­ised crime sto­ry­line. Though their con­niv­ing is framed as a kind of sociopa­thy, the women’s per­son­al­i­ties are rich and vibrant and full. Set It Off is anoth­er great exam­ple of this, with Queen Latifah’s bol­shy and bril­liant Cleo going to show that butch queer women can chan­nel a very mas­cu­line anger, while hav­ing kind hearts, great minds and good friends. Watch and learn.

Vibrant abstract illustration depicting a castle, arrows, lips, and organic shapes in shades of red, blue, and yellow.

High Camp Villainy

It’s not always easy to look evil in the eye. In lots of films, par­tic­u­lar­ly children’s films, this means sub­vert­ing the straight­for­ward con­cept of aggres­sion, and cast­ing vil­lain­ous char­ac­ters in a slight­ly dif­fer­ent, less intim­i­dat­ing light. This means strip­ping away macho vio­lence, and bring­ing in a glitzy, glam, uncon­scionably evil camp villain.

Take Scar, for instance, Simba’s cru­el uncle and wannabe ruler in The Lion King. His lilt­ing drawl, effete man­ner­isms and cow­ard­li­ness are all ways of hint­ing at queer­ness. Con­ve­nient­ly, these traits posi­tion Scar as a com­plete nega­tion of the hyper-mas­cu­line sto­lid­i­ty that Mufasa embod­ies. Scar is weak and angu­lar, Mufasa is broad and brave; Scar is caught up in nar­cis­sis­tic, rit­u­al­is­tic excess, Mufasa is a martyr.

Look at Jafar, too, in 1992 Dis­ney clas­sic Aladdin and even, more recent­ly, Tam­a­toa, the vil­lain­ous crab in last year’s hit film Moana. To a Lin-Manuel Miran­da sound­track, Tam­a­toa spins exu­ber­ant­ly around his lair, the trea­sure encrust­ing his back sparkling like a giant dis­co ball as he sings and waltzes into the camp vil­lain his­to­ry books.

Watch Rocky Hor­ror Pic­ture Show, how­ev­er, and you can find a clever play on these age-old ideas. This isn’t a queer-cod­ed vil­lain in a het­ero­sex­u­al world: instead, two sup­pos­ed­ly het­ero­sex­u­al vic­tims are thrust into a rau­cous, fan­tas­ti­cal, evil world of queer debauch­ery. It’s as camp as camp can be, and it’s these open­ly queer vil­lains in charge.

Illustration of a man with blonde hair and glasses, set against a bright sun and ocean scene.

I just don’t want your life to be any hard­er than it has to be.” This is some­thing that count­less queer peo­ple will have heard in response to their com­ing out, often from the peo­ple clos­est to them. Con­tained in this cliché is the assump­tion of a trag­ic nar­ra­tive: to be queer is to be sad, and if you can avoid it, you should. It’s lit­tle sur­prise that mis­guid­ed friends and fam­i­ly take this approach when so many of the sto­ries we’re fed about queer­ness are ones that cen­tre depres­sion and men­tal ill health.

Even in Lit­tle Miss Sun­shine, which is by all accounts a perky and opti­mistic look at being an out­sider in a pris­tine world, we see this kind of sto­ry­line unfold. One out­sider is Dwayne, whose exis­ten­tial teen angst leads him to a self-pun­ish­ing vow of silence, and then there’s Olive, whose pot-bel­ly and spec­cy awk­ward­ness leaves her on the fringes of the beau­ty pageant world. But most mem­o­rable, for me, is Frank, the depressed gay uncle and Proust schol­ar, whose ban­daged wrists point to his sui­ci­dal dejec­tion, and whose gay­ness is at the heart of that melancholy.

In A Sin­gle Man, depres­sion again takes cen­tre stage, with a day in the life of Col­in Firth’s abject­ly sad George, a mid­dle-aged col­lege pro­fes­sor whose part­ner died less than a year before. Drift­ing through his day, fur­nished by direc­tor Tom Ford in a sump­tu­ous mix­ture of aes­theti­cism and sad­ness, he sinks help­less­ly into the past, push­es hard against those around him and strug­gles to con­front the real­i­ty of his pain. As is the tra­jec­to­ry of so many queer films, even in his moment of clar­i­ty, George’s sto­ry flies inex­orably towards tragedy.

Not all films that depict men­tal­ly ill queer char­ac­ters make an effort to illu­mi­nate the ways in which a homo­pho­bic soci­ety – not queer­ness itself – might be respon­si­ble for catalysing and rein­forc­ing these men­tal health prob­lems. Show Me Love (also known as Fuck­ing Åmål) is a Swedish film that goes some way towards rem­e­dy­ing this lack. A gen­tle, ambling explo­ration of the lives of two queer teen girls in small-town Swe­den, it hints at the ways that Agnes’s depres­sion and self-harm might be traced back to the iso­la­tion and anx­i­ety she feels as a bul­lied, not-yet-out young person.

Woman with curly brown hair wearing a white dress and a red flower accessory in her hair, smiling.

Trans­gen­der peo­ple have a long and trou­ble­some his­to­ry of their lives being instru­men­talised to rep­re­sent crazi­ness’ on film. Before trans­gen­der rights and real­i­ties had begun to gain trac­tion in the main­stream, Alfred Hitchcock’s 1960 hor­ror clas­sic, Psy­cho, set the tone. Nor­man Bates is the film’s epony­mous psy­cho, with his cross-dress­ing and his preda­tori­ness por­trayed as two sides of the same psy­chopa­thy. We are sup­posed to fear him not so much because of what he’s capa­ble of, but what he is: a per­son split along lines of gen­der and san­i­ty, and whose inner ugli­ness leaks out of all the cracks in between.

The Silence of The Lambs picks up where Psy­cho left off, when it comes to trans­gen­der iden­ti­ties being used as a short­hand for insan­i­ty. Here the link between trans­gen­der lives and vio­lence is drawn even more explic­it­ly, though, with the film’s elu­sive ser­i­al killer fash­ion­ing a kind of suit’ out of the skin of their female vic­tims. This vio­lence is a sur­ro­gate for the for­mal sex reas­sign­ment surgery denied to Buf­fa­lo Bill some years pri­or. There’s no equiv­o­ca­tion between gen­der tran­si­tion and vio­lence: trans­gen­der lives mean surgery, and surgery is butch­ery, we’re told.

It’s not just trans­gen­der peo­ple who have had their iden­ti­ties made sym­bols for mad­ness. To drift into the world of TV for a moment, take a look at Willow’s jour­ney from sweet­ness to unmit­i­gat­ed evil in Buffy the Vam­pire Slay­er, con­ve­nient­ly con­cur­rent with her bur­geon­ing queer­ness. Some­thing sim­i­lar hap­pens in Black Swan, too, as dark­ness rip­ples around Natal­ie Portman’s trou­bled Nina and her bisex­u­al­i­ty blooms.

In The Tal­ent­ed Mr Rip­ley, this trope reach­es a daz­zling­ly vio­lent and seduc­tive peak, with Matt Damon’s por­tray­al of cold-blood­ed killer and patho­log­i­cal liar, Tom Rip­ley. Tom’s cod­ed homo­sex­u­al­i­ty isn’t just inci­den­tal to his cru­el­ness: it’s pre­cise­ly his obses­sion with Dick­ie Green­leaf that leads him to descend so abrupt­ly into mad­ness. It’s a film ripe with queer romance and erot­ic ten­sion, all tee­ter­ing on the knife edge of Tom’s wan­ing sanity.

This is an extract from Do What You Want, a zine about men­tal well­be­ing, rais­ing mon­ey for men­tal health charities.

You might like