Unpacking the myth of The Wizard of Oz’s hanging… | Little White Lies

Unpack­ing the myth of The Wiz­ard of Oz’s hang­ing Munchkin

11 Aug 2019

Words by James McMahon

Wooden cabin in forest, with green roof; yellow brick path leading through trees and undergrowth.
Wooden cabin in forest, with green roof; yellow brick path leading through trees and undergrowth.
Did a mem­ber of the sup­port­ing cast real­ly com­mit sui­cide on the set of MGM’s clas­sic musical?

Released 80 years ago, Vic­tor Fleming’s The Wiz­ard of Oz is best remem­bered – and indeed beloved – for its pio­neer­ing use of Tech­ni­col­or (in Baum’s book, Dorothy’s shoes are sil­ver, not ruby; they were changed to show­case the new colour motion pic­ture process) and for com­pos­er Her­bert Stothart’s Oscar-win­ning score.

Of course, the film is also noto­ri­ous for exac­er­bat­ing both Judy Garland’s use of amphet­a­mines and bar­bi­tu­rates – pre­scribed to her at the behest of Louis B May­er in order to increase the young star’s pro­duc­tiv­i­ty on set – and her self-image issues. May­er lat­er referred to the 16-year-old as his lit­tle hunch­back”, and in 1947, less than 10 years after her break­through role, Gar­land tried to kill her­self for the first time.

Dark­ness abounds in The Wiz­ard of Oz. The man orig­i­nal­ly cast to play the Tin Man, Bud­dy Ebsen, end­ed up in an iron lung after his sil­ver make-up, made up of alu­mini­um pow­der, got into his lungs. Wicked Witch Mar­garet Hamil­ton also spent time in the hos­pi­tal, suf­fer­ing sec­ond-degree burns on her face and third-degree burns on her hand. Once recov­ered, she returned to work under the pro­vi­so she would no longer have to work with fire. Her stunt-dou­ble, Bet­ty Danko, sub­se­quent­ly spent 11 days in the hos­pi­tal after the broom­stick’ she was sat on – basi­cal­ly a paint­ed smok­ing pipe – explod­ed. The burns on her legs nev­er healed.

Delv­ing deep­er into the film’s murky back­sto­ry, there is one urban leg­end that repeat­ed­ly sur­faces: that an actor who played a Munchkin can be seen hang­ing them­selves dur­ing the scene – which has come to be known as the Tin Woods­man sequence – where Dorothy, the Scare­crow and the Tin Man skip down the Yel­low Brick Road bound for the Emer­ald City.

The studio’s offi­cial line has long been that what looks like a lit­tle per­son swing­ing from a tree is actu­al­ly a shad­ow cast by a large crane, hired by Flem­ing, along with oth­er ani­mals from the Los Ange­les zoo, in an attempt to make the for­est seem alive. It is said that as the trio began skip­ping down the road, the crane unfold­ed its wings defen­sive­ly, cast­ing a strange shad­ow in the background.

This sup­posed myth is com­pli­cat­ed fur­ther by the mul­ti­ple ver­sions of the film that exist. When The Wiz­ard of Oz was re-released in 1989 for its 50th anniver­sary, the con­fus­ing footage had been cleaned up. The bird appears in a dif­fer­ent place to where it first appeared. This is the ver­sion that is now con­sid­ered the defin­i­tive cut, the one you’ll like­ly have seen on tele­vi­sion. Yet if you review the orig­i­nal footage, it still feels like some­thing is off.

Snopes​.com, the internet’s go-to resource for fact check­ing urban leg­ends and folk­lore, sug­gests alter­na­tive the­o­ries for the illu­sion, includ­ing a stage­hand wan­der­ing on set, or even falling from one of the trees. They note that it is impor­tant to remem­ber the res­o­lu­tion of the film when shown on tele­vi­sion – when the abil­i­ty, via VHS, arrived to fast for­ward and rewind footage – isn’t as sharp and as dis­tinct as when the film was shown in cin­e­mas. It was only when the film was released on home video that the leg­end real­ly took on a life of its own. Details were added to the sto­ry; the actor play­ing the doomed Munchkin was lovelorn’, and the actor’s behav­iour dur­ing the pro­duc­tion was brought into question.

Pro­duc­er Mervyn LeRoy once stat­ed that the actors had orgies in the hotel and we had to have police on every floor”. Gar­land, as well as alleg­ing that many of the Munchkins groped her, recalled them as drunks” who got smashed every night and the police had to scoop them up in but­ter­fly nets.” Make-up artist Jack Dawn once told the sto­ry of a Ger­man lit­tle per­son who got drunk, fell into a toi­let and had to be res­cued. What is not wide­ly enough known is that the US actors cast as Munchkins had just sur­vived the Great Depres­sion, many work­ing as car­ni­val freaks’ or as vaude­ville com­e­dy acts. Oth­ers had fled Nazi per­se­cu­tion in Europe.

In May 2018, the last sur­viv­ing actor to play a Munchkin in the film, Jer­ry Maren, passed away aged 97. He often said that the Munchkins’ alleged bad behav­iour had been over­stat­ed, cit­ing a com­bi­na­tion of excite­ment – for many it was the first time they’d met oth­ers like them; Maren was the only lit­tle per­son in his own fam­i­ly – and the wages paid to them. My father worked in a hotel and earned $5 a week,” Maren once recalled. I got $50 a week [on the film].” And yet Ter­ry, the Cairn Ter­ri­er that played Toto, was paid $125. Leo Von Singer, man­ag­er of pop­u­lar vaude­ville group Singer’s Midgets’, was paid $100 for every lit­tle per­son he brought in. He pock­et­ed 50 per cent.

The fact that the Munchkins weren’t due to arrive on set until after the Tin Woods­man sequence had been filmed should be enough to put paid to the leg­end that one of them met their mak­er in the woods. The exploita­tion of an already belea­guered minor­i­ty should be remem­bered and analysed with­out a sin­is­ter tall tale taint­ing their legacy.

You might like

Accessibility Settings

Text

Applies the Open Dyslexic font, designed to improve readability for individuals with dyslexia.

Applies a more readable font throughout the website, improving readability.

Underlines links throughout the website, making them easier to distinguish.

Adjusts the font size for improved readability.

Visuals

Reduces animations and disables autoplaying videos across the website, reducing distractions and improving focus.

Reduces the colour saturation throughout the website to create a more soothing visual experience.

Increases the contrast of elements on the website, making text and interface elements easier to distinguish.