How Graham Greene became one of cinema’s greatest… | Little White Lies

In Praise Of

How Gra­ham Greene became one of cinema’s great­est writers

04 Apr 2016

Words by Tom Graham

A man in a hat and a woman in a polka dot dress, both looking serious, in a black and white film still.
A man in a hat and a woman in a polka dot dress, both looking serious, in a black and white film still.
Twen­ty five years on from his death, the nov­el­ist famed for his film noir screen­plays remains a key influence.

If child­hood is the bank bal­ance of the writer,” then British nov­el­ist Gra­ham Greene had plen­ty to draw on. School, where his father loomed as head­mas­ter, was a mis­er­able place. Fol­low­ing sev­er­al sui­cide attempts Greene was sent away for six months of Jun­gian dream ther­a­py in Lon­don, where rumour has it he had an affair with his therapist’s wife. Soon after, depres­sion set in, and he end­ed up play­ing Russ­ian roulette with a loaded pis­tol just for the thrill, feel­ing for a brief moment as if car­ni­val lights had been switched on in a dark drab street.” Beneath his mea­sured, tight-lipped prose there was con­stant turmoil.

Greene went on to study at Oxford Uni­ver­si­ty, where he began writ­ing in earnest. His first vol­ume of poet­ry, Bab­bling April’, sank with­out a trace, and three roman­tic adven­tures nov­els were cool­ly received. He sup­port­ed him­self as a film crit­ic, first for stu­dent mag­a­zines, then for The Spec­ta­tor and the jour­nal Night and Day. Angst over stalled nov­els was allayed by gild­ed cards invit­ing him to press pre­views. He reviewed more than 400 films; it was the start of a fruit­ful love affair between nov­el­ist and cinema.

As a crit­ic, Greene was acidic and mis­chie­vous. He caused a stir with his review of Wee Willie Winkie, writ­ing of nine-year-old Shirley Tem­ple that infan­cy is her dis­guise, her appeal is more secret and more adult… Her admir­ers – mid­dle-aged men and cler­gy­men – respond to her dubi­ous coquetry… only because the safe­ty cur­tain of sto­ry and dia­logue drops between their intel­li­gence and their desire.” This was 25 years before Loli­ta, and it was scan­dalous stuff. Twen­ti­eth Cen­tu­ry Fox sued for libel, Night and Day went bust and Greene hasti­ly decamped to Mex­i­co until the storm passed.

All the while Greene strug­gled to break out as a nov­el­ist. In the hope of pro­duc­ing a best­seller, he turned to the detec­tive sto­ry – only then did Hol­ly­wood begin to pay atten­tion. He began sell­ing the rights to his books, and ear­ly box office hits includ­ed This Gun for Hire and Min­istry of Fear. Greene mixed high lit­er­a­ture and genre writ­ing, and through films like The Third Man and Brighton Rock he played an impor­tant role in the pop­u­lar­i­sa­tion of film noir. Although the con­text of his nov­els was some­times changed for Amer­i­can audi­ences, the bleak mood, con­flict­ed men and unfath­omable women remained. His imag­i­na­tion was fired by the seedy and the cor­rupt, by temp­ta­tion and sin – and the allure of sin was some­thing Greene under­stood bet­ter than most.

I had to find a reli­gion,” Greene once said, to mea­sure my evil against.” Born in a god­less cen­tu­ry and versed in the rel­a­tivism of psy­cho­analy­sis, he nonethe­less felt the pull of absolute good and evil. In this con­text his own ambiva­lence – his work for MI6 and his endur­ing friend­ship with the Sovi­et dou­ble agent Kim Phil­by; his Catholi­cism and his inter­est in broth­els and dic­ta­tors – is intrigu­ing. As he put it, Human nature is not black and white but black and grey” – a line which could have come from any world-weary sleuth. With­in this grey area, Greene rarely pro­vid­ed a final, sat­is­fy­ing judge­ment on his char­ac­ters: When we are not sure, we are alive.”

Twen­ty five years since his death on 3 April 1991, 19 of Greene’s 26 nov­els have been adapt­ed as films. Per­haps no oth­er novelist’s work has proven so ripe for adap­ta­tion, and crit­ics have often observed the cin­e­mat­ic” traits in his writ­ing. Among those iden­ti­fied are the use of mul­ti­ple per­spec­tive, a selec­tive eye for detail and a pun­gent sense of place that almost con­sti­tutes a char­ac­ter in itself. Greene him­self said that, when I describe a scene, I cap­ture it with the mov­ing eye of a cam­era.” While there may be some truth in those traits, it’s no coin­ci­dence that the pin­na­cle of his film career dove­tailed with the rise of film noir. The enig­mat­ic Greene was the nov­el­ist of the soul, and his moral angst trans­lat­ed per­fect­ly into com­pro­mised char­ac­ters on screen.

You might like