Why the identity crisis in Ghost in the Shell… | Little White Lies

In Praise Of

Why the iden­ti­ty cri­sis in Ghost in the Shell still res­onates today

18 Mar 2017

Words by Greg Evans

Animated character with dark hair, serious expression, and cityscape backdrop.
Animated character with dark hair, serious expression, and cityscape backdrop.
In Mamoru Oshii’s clas­sic ani­mé, char­ac­ters seek indi­vid­u­al­i­ty with­in an increas­ing­ly arti­fi­cial society.

Thanks to the con­stant devel­op­ment and expan­sion of the inter­net, we have now reached a point where we are able to project iden­ti­ties and per­son­al­i­ties that do not tru­ly reflect the lives we lead. But what if tech­nol­o­gy advanced to the point that our minds could roam free, no longer shack­led by the lim­i­ta­tions of a human body? That is the cen­tral dilem­ma of Mamoru Oshii’s clas­sic 1995 ani­mé, Ghost in the Shell.

Our hero, Motoko Kusana­gi, is a cyborg police offi­cer tasked with lead­ing an anti-cyber ter­ror­ism unit in a futur­is­tic Japan­ese city, where every­one is con­nect­ed to a mass elec­tron­ic net­work. Peo­ple can access this data field through their arti­fi­cial bod­ies, oth­er­wise known as shells’. One of the few remain­ing bio­log­i­cal aspects of these bod­ies is the brain, which retains a con­science that is known as a ghost’. Motoko and her team are on the trail of the Pup­pet Mas­ter, an elite hack­er who has the abil­i­ty to access the minds of oth­er cyborgs in this world and use them to do his bid­ding. His emer­gence, and the idea of enter­ing anoth­er body, piqué Motoko’s inter­est while pro­vid­ing the film with its nar­ra­tive drive.

In order to analyse the iden­ti­ty cri­sis at the heart Ghost in the Shell, it is impor­tant to con­sid­er the sur­round­ings in which the sto­ry takes place. Thir­ty min­utes in there is a four-minute sequence that guides us through the city. The orig­i­nal cityscape still stands but has been left to ruin in the shad­ow of impos­si­bly huge sky­scrap­ers, which look more like machines than build­ings. The feel­ing of con­stant change lingers long after this scene, as the peo­ple con­tin­ue with their dai­ly lives prac­ti­cal­ly obliv­i­ous to the cul­tur­al con­flict that is hap­pen­ing around them.

Dur­ing this scene, we see Motoko trav­el­ling on a boat through the city’s canal sys­tem. She gazes at the build­ings and those around her, not with con­tempt but melan­choly. At one point she spots anoth­er girl, who is the spit­ting image of her. They observe each oth­er with­out reg­is­ter­ing an emo­tion­al reac­tion. This is the only hint that Motoko might be a mod­el assem­bled on a fac­to­ry pro­duc­tion line, defined only by her mind. It is only a pass­ing moment but one that con­veys a strong sense of lone­li­ness and detachment.

Motoko lacks any dis­cern­able per­son­al­i­ty traits and shows no real under­stand­ing of human emo­tions. She often appears nude in front of col­leagues, which sym­bol­is­es her vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty while also empha­sis­es the fact that she has no con­cept of what it means to expose one­self pub­licly. Her part­ner, Batou, averts his eyes on more than one of these occa­sions and even cov­ers her up with his coat. Motoko doesn’t wish to cause Batou any embar­rass­ment nor does he want to feel like he is exploit­ing her body.

Gen­der is anoth­er issue with­in the com­plex work­ings of Ghost in the Shell. Despite hav­ing a female body and an effem­i­nate voice, it is unclear whether Motoko iden­ti­fies her­self as a woman – or even as a human. Dur­ing the stun­ning open­ing cred­its sequence, we wit­ness the for­ma­tion of her body and see that she has no gen­i­talia. At one point she jokes about it being her time of the month” but we are well aware that she lacks the func­tions to men­stru­ate. That moment, along with a few admit­tances of show­ing emo­tion, tells us that she desires to be human. But that changes when she final­ly meets the elu­sive Pup­pet Master.

When she first encoun­ters him, he is occu­py­ing a female shell – not out of choice or neces­si­ty but pure­ly for its func­tion­al­i­ty as a tool. The Pup­pet Mas­ter then claims that he is a form of arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence that has become self-aware. With that rev­e­la­tion comes a pro­found piece of think­ing: the Pup­pet Mas­ter tells Motoko that search­ing for one­self is impos­si­ble because indi­vid­u­als are con­stant­ly chang­ing, there­fore try­ing to obtain a per­fect iden­ti­ty is irrel­e­vant. He encour­ages Motoko to merge with him and aban­don her search in order to cre­ate a high­er life-form that isn’t restrict­ed by the bound­aries of body and mind.

Motoko’s evo­lu­tion is a mul­ti-lay­ered explo­ration into the very essence of exis­tence. The divi­sions that sep­a­rate ghosts and shells are metic­u­lous­ly dis­sect­ed in the film, lead­ing to an avalanche of metaphors and dense dia­logue. The scope of Oshii’s film knows no bounds and new ideas are revealed in repeat view­ings. There may be more con­cise inves­ti­ga­tions into iden­ti­ty in the his­to­ry of cin­e­ma, yet Ghost in the Shell remains the among the most fas­ci­nat­ing and rewarding.

You might like