Why Demon Seed is the perfect companion piece to… | Little White Lies

If You Like...

Why Demon Seed is the per­fect com­pan­ion piece to Black Mirror

05 Nov 2016

Words by Lauren Thompson

A woman's face with eyes closed, covered in electronic wires.
A woman's face with eyes closed, covered in electronic wires.
Before Char­lie Brooker’s dark social satire, there was Don­ald Cammell’s techno­pho­bic sci-fi.

The notion of a sen­tient machine force­ful­ly insem­i­nat­ing a woman may not seem all that far-fetched today. But while recent shows like Black Mir­ror have suc­cess­ful­ly tapped into our col­lec­tive techno­pho­bia, cin­e­ma has been offer­ing a sim­i­lar­ly twist­ed social cri­tique as far back as 1977. Don­ald Cammell’s night­mar­ish, qui­et­ly self-reflec­tive Demon Seed is a hid­den gem of the sci-fi genre. Adapt­ed from a hor­ror nov­el by Dean Koontz, it takes our fear of cor­rupt­ed tech­nol­o­gy and ampli­fies it through the lens of Pro­teus IV, a high func­tion­ing super com­put­er voiced cool­ly by Robert Vaughn.

The brain­child of sci­en­tist Alex Har­ris (Fritz Weaver), Pro­teus com­man­deers the ter­mi­nals in the base­ment of its maker’s house where, unbe­knownst to Alex, his wife Susan (Julie Christie) is being held cap­tive. Nor­mal­ly a place of refuge and sanc­tu­ary, here the house becomes the trap, a prison to be feared. The base­ment, where the birth of the human-child hybrid takes place is the sym­bol­ic womb. Dark and iso­lat­ed, it is the incu­ba­tion room for Pro­teus’ grotesque human-machine hybrid.

Demon Seed is part of a long line of hor­ror films that toy with themes of the mon­strous womb, turn­ing woman’s repro­duc­tive capac­i­ty into some­thing to be feared. Pro­teus takes advan­tage of it to trans­fer his con­scious­ness to a liv­ing host that will lat­er burst forth in all its metal­lic, cop­per-haired, drip­ping monstrosity.

Film writer Leo Gold­smith has described the film as a com­bi­na­tion of [Stan­ley] Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey and [Roman] Polanski’s Rosemary’s Baby, with a dash of Buster Keaton’s The Elec­tric House thrown in.” Though it could just as eas­i­ly be com­pared with likes of The Fly, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde and even Franken­stein. All are films that deal with the cre­ation of the oth­er’ by unnat­ur­al means, not to men­tion phys­i­cal defor­mi­ty. In this sce­nario Pro­teus is the mad sci­en­tist, Susan the unwill­ing test subject.

A sleeping person lying on a bed with medical equipment visible nearby.

All of this coin­cides with the break­down of the Har­ris’ mar­riage. The cracks that have worked their way into their rela­tion­ship since their young daughter’s death now run too deep. Alex’s grief man­i­fests in his worka­holic ten­den­cies, as he hopes to find a tech­no­log­i­cal cure for the can­cer that stole his daugh­ter. Mean­while Susan is wary of the tech­nol­o­gy that has now become such an inte­gral part of her home. My dream turns out to be your night­mare,” says Alex of the work that keeps him away from home, in the most beau­ti­ful­ly obvi­ous bit of fore­shad­ow­ing the film has to offer.

Freudi­an notions of the uncan­ny’ weave their way through the film – the fear of the dou­ble. It can be felt in Pro­teus’ desire to mim­ic mankind and become it. More lit­er­al­ly, it man­i­fests in the cyborg dou­ble of the Har­ris’ dead daugh­ter as she emerges from beneath the metal­lic scabs that encase her. Their emo­tions are manip­u­lat­ed in this moment, plagued with a mix­ture of joy at being able to see their daugh­ter again in the flesh, but also ter­ror at the notion that despite appear­ances, this is not the child they once knew and loved.

Pro­teus’ goal is com­pa­ra­bly small scale com­pared to oth­er super­com­put­ers of his time. It doesn’t want to enslave mankind like the machines in the Matrix tril­o­gy, or rule the world like Colos­sus in Joseph Sargent’s The Forbin Project’. It wants to expe­ri­ence it as a liv­ing being. Its inten­tion is easy to sym­pa­thise with, but it’s what it is will­ing to do to get there that makes this film tru­ly hor­ri­fy­ing. The true revul­sion lies in the film’s epi­cen­tral rape and tor­ture scenes, their sado­masochis­tic, sen­sa­tion­al­is­tic ele­ments rever­ber­at­ing through the film. It could be argued that this detracts from the sci­ence fic­tion plot and plays into rape fan­tasies of female degra­da­tion and exploita­tion for male pleasure.

Though uncom­fort­able, they’re taste­ful­ly han­dled in a way that leaves most of Susan’s trau­ma at the hands of Pro­teus up to the imag­i­na­tion. Susan is with­out a doubt a capa­ble char­ac­ter, her strength high­light­ed at the end of the film. In a com­men­tary on male intel­li­gence as a force for detri­ment and destruc­tion, Susan’s abil­i­ty to ensure the future of mankind by pass­ing on pos­i­tive human traits worth safe­guard­ing posi­tions her as the pos­i­tive force in an oth­er­wise bleak film. Our child will learn from you what it is to be human,” Pro­teus observes of her.

Visu­al­ly speak­ing, even today Demon Seed appears impres­sive­ly ahead of its time. A par­tic­u­lar­ly spec­tac­u­lar scene sees Pro­teus show Susan what its eyes” – sen­si­tive to the entire­ty of the elec­tro­mag­net­ic spec­trum – can see. A pat­terned light show fan­ta­sia steals the screen, a hyp­not­ic vor­tex of psy­che­del­ic colours and geo­met­ric shapes swirl into obliv­ion, bom­bard­ing us with over­whelm­ing sen­so­ry input. A lat­er man­i­fes­ta­tion of Pro­teus as a large, unrav­elled tetra­he­dron-like object that takes over the base­ment in a crush­ing, spin­ning fren­zy could almost be passed off as CGI.

It’s tes­ta­ment to the excel­lent pro­duc­tion design and over­all art direc­tion achieved by Edward Carfag­no and spe­cial effects super­vi­sor Glen Robin­son. While it isn’t exact­ly remem­bered as a clas­sic exam­ple of 70s sci­ence fic­tion, Demon Seed touch­es on some inter­est­ing themes, and if noth­ing else, will suc­ceed in weird­ing you the hell out.

You might like