Timbuktu | Little White Lies

Tim­buk­tu

29 May 2015 / Released: 29 May 2015

A man wearing a dark turban and scarf covering his face, looking directly at the camera.
A man wearing a dark turban and scarf covering his face, looking directly at the camera.
4

Anticipation.

Abderrahmane Sissako is fast becoming the most important voice of contemporary African cinema.

5

Enjoyment.

A terse but poetic humanist masterpiece that’s riveting from its first frames.

5

In Retrospect.

A film that’s guaranteed to resonate for years to come.

Do not miss this scin­til­lat­ing and poet­ic study of polit­i­cal extrem­ism from direc­tor Abder­rah­mane Sissako.

Tim­buk­tu is not an espe­cial­ly manip­u­la­tive film, but it strives to com­pli­cate and con­fuse the pri­mal emo­tions pro­voked by its know­ing imagery. Direc­tor Abder­rah­mane Sis­sako begins with acts of bul­ly­ing sav­agery: armed mem­bers of Ansar Dine, crammed into a pick-up truck that’s fly­ing the ISIS flag, chase down a help­less impala as it skit­ters across the desert flats. Next, they fire a hail of bul­lets at a row of price­less Malian arti­facts, oblit­er­at­ing frag­ile wood­en fig­ures that they could prob­a­bly have bro­ken with their bare hands. When the armed men trot out a blind­fold­ed hostage, the film seems tilt­ed towards becom­ing an illus­trat­ed laun­dry list of extrem­ist bar­barism, but Sis­sako sud­den­ly mud­dies the water.

Rather than exe­cute their cap­tive, the jihadists begin to take care­ful record of his pre­scrip­tion med­ica­tion – their rea­sons for want­i­ng to keep the man healthy may be more sin­is­ter than we ever have the chance to learn, but regard­less of their inten­tions, it’s deeply unset­tling to hear the most icon­ic mur­der­ers of the 21st cen­tu­ry dis­cussing how to keep some­one alive. As the casu­al con­ver­sa­tion turns towards the dif­fer­ences between brand and gener­ic drugs, this fleet­ing beat finds its place in Sissako’s rhythm: Tim­buk­tu is a mosa­ic of moments that, alone and col­lec­tive­ly, work to expose the irre­ducible pearl of human­i­ty that makes it impos­si­ble for ide­ol­o­gy to take a com­plete and per­fect hold over its host.

Still, it would be ludi­crous to sug­gest that the film attempts to absolve these fun­da­men­tal­ists. On the con­trary, Sis­sako expos­es the soft tis­sue beneath their armour, their crimes made all the more trag­ic by how del­i­cate­ly he’s able to lift the veil. As with 2002’s Wait­ing for Hap­pi­ness and 2006’s Bamako before it, Sissako’s lat­est trains its eye on a place in time and organ­i­cal­ly allows sev­er­al nar­ra­tives to emerge, some of which metas­ta­sise into vio­lence. Appro­pri­ate­ly, Sis­sako has Ansar Dine wend their way into the city like a malig­nant can­cer. They force a pass­ing man to roll up his pants (he can’t, so he takes them off instead). They demand that a woman in a hijab wear gloves when she sells fish in the pub­lic square (she tells them how dif­fi­cult that would make it to do her job, but the com­plaint falls on deaf ears).

Abdelk­er­im (Abel Jafri), Ansar Dine’s local leader, strolls into a mosque with a sense of divine pur­pose, armed to the teeth. When the imam ques­tions his actions, the insur­gent answers that he and his men are Doing jihad,” his response as casu­al as some­one shar­ing their plans for the afternoon.

Mean­while, on the dunes out­side of town, a Tamasheq nomad named Kidane (Ibrahim Ahmed) sings for­bid­den music for his wife (Toulou Kiki), their daugh­ter, and the orphaned boy they’ve adopt­ed into their fam­i­ly. Kidane’s home is as open to strangers as it is to the skies above, the anachro­nis­tic trib­al­ism of his liv­ing con­di­tions just one of the many details that locates Tim­buk­tu at a cross­roads between old tra­di­tions and mod­ern influ­ences. The jihadists dri­ve Amer­i­can pick-up trucks and dis­cuss the most recent – pre­sum­ably tele­vised – acro­bat­ics of Argen­tin­ian foot­ball star Lionel Mes­si. Every­one (even Kidane) owns a mobile phone. Endear­ing­ly, the way­ward cow whose mur­der trig­gers the film’s cen­tral tragedy is named GPS.”

Sissako’s Tim­buk­tu is a place that’s being drawn and quar­tered. The mod­ern world has clear­ly arrived, and yet Ansar Dine’s vio­lent régime is hell-bent on revers­ing the flow of time, their occu­pa­tion deter­mined to top­ple Tim­buk­tu like an hour­glass that’s been turned upside down. Their cam­paign exerts a grim grav­i­ta­tion­al pull on every­one with­in its reach – the sequence of events by which Kidane ulti­mate­ly finds him­self at the mer­cy of a jihadist tri­bunal is hard­ly irrel­e­vant, but Sissako’s ele­gant plot­ting is nev­er­the­less eclipsed by the inevitabil­i­ty of his protagonist’s fate.

Nat­u­ral­ly, the film’s sole untouch­able char­ac­ter is the only one who can stride between worlds. Zabou (Ket­tly Noël) is the local fool, the crazy woman who speaks truth to pow­er and reflects the mad­ness around her. As Sissako’s nar­ra­tive blos­soms, Zabou’s pres­ence can be felt stretch­ing across the city and even­tu­al­ly can­vass­ing all of Tim­buk­tu like the place is cov­ered by a giant cir­cus tent. Dai­ly life assumes the feel of a grotesque car­ni­val per­for­mance – the film’s most indeli­ble scene finds a group of boys flout­ing Ansar Dine’s ban on foot­ball with a pan­tomimed game, their vivid­ly imag­ined match con­found­ing the vivid­ly imag­ined doc­trine that cov­ers their world with its shadow.

Tim­buk­tu thrives in these strange lim­bos between defi­ance and res­ig­na­tion. Sis­sako repeat­ed­ly frus­trates the rigid­i­ty of ide­ol­o­gy with the flu­id­i­ty of human­ism, and even the film’s most trag­ic turns have a way of defy­ing the demands of those orches­trat­ing them. Com­mu­ni­ca­tion is often as fraught between peo­ple as it is between the ideas that define them, the var­i­ous lan­guages spo­ken by the film’s char­ac­ters (Eng­lish, French, Ara­bic and Tamasheq) turn­ing the even­tu­al con­ver­sa­tions between Kidane and Abdelk­er­im into a most per­verse game of telephone.

The clar­i­ty of Amine Bouhafa’s ele­giac score only serves to under­score that con­fu­sion, its resigned and plain­tive beau­ty push­ing things ever for­ward to the narrative’s trag­ic con­clu­sion. And though Tim­buk­tu resolves in the only way it could, the end of this sto­ry does not, of course, spell the end of its name­sake. After all, there’s a good rea­son why the film takes place in 2012: if it were set in 2015, the pres­ence of Ansar Dine would be a glar­ing anachronism.

You might like