The Filmmaker’s House | Little White Lies

The Filmmaker’s House

24 Jun 2021 / Released: 25 Jun 2021

Words by Anton Bitel

Directed by Marc Isaacs

Starring Keith Martin, Luz Nery Villada, and Rachel Wexler

Woman in black face mask relaxing in a bathtub full of water and bubbles, surrounded by bath products and decorative wall hangings.
Woman in black face mask relaxing in a bathtub full of water and bubbles, surrounded by bath products and decorative wall hangings.
3

Anticipation.

Is this the world’s first open house documentary?

2

Enjoyment.

Pat liberalism at its most cringe-making.

3

In Retrospect.

And yet slyly confronting in its contrivance.

Marc Isaacs’ docu-fic­tion hybrid has fun sub­vert­ing the sit-com for­mat, but feels glib and exploitative.

Unable to get financ­ing for any doc­u­men­tary that does not involve ser­i­al killers, and far more inter­est­ed in the every­day prob­lems of human beings,” doc­u­men­tar­i­an Marc Isaacs takes the advice of his pro­duc­er Rachel (Rachel Wexler) to just start film­ing, just do it,” and begins one day in his own bour­geois Lon­don home.

Soon he is play­ing host not only to his clean­er Nery (Luz Nery Vil­la­da) and to racist builder Kei­th (Kei­th Mar­tin) and his assis­tant Jed (Jed Thomas Isaacs), but also to cheer­i­ly needy Mikel (Mikel Novosad), a home­less Slo­va­kian alco­holic who just will not leave. As this strange assort­ment of peo­ple from dif­fer­ent class­es, eth­nic­i­ties, faiths and back­grounds all sit togeth­er for a lunch pre­pared by neigh­bour Zara (Zara Akram) – who is her­self fast­ing for Ramadan – Isaacs’ house becomes a micro­cosm of mul­ti­cul­tur­al Eng­land, where prob­lems are resolved ami­ca­bly around a table.

So The Filmmaker’s House seems to offer itself as a cor­dial alter­na­tive to the kind of edgy true-crime sub­ject mat­ter that abounds in con­tem­po­rary urban doc­u­men­taries. For in this fly-on-the-wall view of British hos­pi­tal­i­ty (which even clos­es with a quote from Jacques Der­ri­da about the poet­ry in hos­pi­tal­i­ty), every­one is wel­comed into the house with open arms, and dif­fer­ences are set­tled over a nice cup of tea.

Yet a sequence which opens Isaacs’ film – but comes from near its chrono­log­i­cal end – intro­duces a note of dis­com­fit­ing irony to all that fol­lows. Here, as Isaacs vis­its – and con­tin­ues to film – Mikel laid out in a hos­pi­tal bed with sep­sis in his arm, the smil­ing patient wry­ly observes, This may be good for your movie… That’s real. That’s a real thing.” For all the polite­ness of their deliv­ery, Mikel’s unset­tling words estab­lish from the out­set the exploita­tive nature of Isaacs’ doc­u­men­tary, while also call­ing into ques­tion its claims to truth.

We will spend the rest of the view­ing time unpick­ing the impli­ca­tions of this moment, as we try to dis­en­tan­gle the doc­u­men­tary form of The Filmmaker’s House from the sit­com-like con­trivance of its sce­nario (which is indeed script­ed by Isaacs and David Charap). The pic­ture that the film paints is a lit­tle too cosy to be believed, and if Mikel’s cour­te­ous­ly dis­rup­tive pres­ence is not enough to under­mine the pat mes­sage of good will to all, then the return home of Isaacs’ wife punc­tures the illu­sion even fur­ther and expos­es the arti­fice of this sup­posed day in the life’.

Isaacs may be mend­ing fences with his neigh­bours, and his home may bring xeno­phobes and migrants, Mus­lims and Jews, all under the one con­vivial roof – but there is not enough room here to accom­mo­date the awful, insis­tent real­i­ty of Mikel’s prob­lems or, pre­cise­ly, his home­less­ness. Ulti­mate­ly Isaacs’ sophis­ti­cat­ed, sly­ly con­fronting film is con­cerned not just with hos­pi­tal­i­ty, but with its limits.

You might like