The Aftermath movie review (2019) | Little White Lies

The After­math

26 Feb 2019 / Released: 01 Mar 2019

A woman with long, dark hair wearing a yellow cardigan, looking pensive in a dimly lit room.
A woman with long, dark hair wearing a yellow cardigan, looking pensive in a dimly lit room.
4

Anticipation.

Whoever cut the trailer deserves some kind of award.

4

Enjoyment.

There’s more to this melodrama than meets the eye.

3

In Retrospect.

A delight that could have been much more.

Keira Knight­ley and Alexan­der Skars­gård expe­ri­ence for­bid­den love in post­war Germany.

Fol­low­ing the dis­cord caused by the romance between an Aryan youth and a mixed-race girl in Amma Asante’s 2018 dra­ma Where Hands Touch, you’d be for­giv­en for approach­ing The After­math with cau­tion. Its syn­op­sis sug­gests a sim­i­lar­ly odd mix of real-life hor­ror and ques­tion­able romance.

Set dur­ing the first few months of post-World War Two recon­struc­tion, in the ruins of Ham­burg, the film fol­lows a British woman (Keira Knight­ley) torn between her hero­ic Eng­lish colonel hus­band, Lewis (Jason Clarke), and the beau­ti­ful Ger­man wid­ow­er, Ste­fan (Alexan­der Skars­gård), whose man­sion the British army has req­ui­si­tioned for the couple’s use.

Yet The After­math nei­ther asks view­ers to relate to any char­ac­ters affil­i­at­ed with the Nazis, nor does it attempt to address the dif­fi­cult ques­tion of those who, like most mem­bers of the Hitler Youth in Asante’s film, sim­ply’ fol­lowed orders. The film does, how­ev­er, ques­tion the gut reac­tions and desires for revenge that cer­tain Allies under­stand­ably felt at the time – although it does so from the safer posi­tion of the post­war peri­od, and with more nuance than Asante’s film.

Keira Knightley’s Rachael is dis­gust­ed by her husband’s friend­li­ness towards the Ger­man man who is giv­ing them his home. Like many oth­er peo­ple from Allied coun­tries at the time, she can­not imag­ine that any Ger­mans could be inno­cent, and despis­es them all. While Lubert and his teenage daugh­ter Fre­da (Flo­ra Thie­mann) wait to be trans­ferred some­where else, Rachael and the Luberts are forced to live under the same roof, a sit­u­a­tion which the woman finds near­ly intolerable.

Scenes of this dif­fi­cult cohab­i­ta­tion at home’ are jux­ta­posed with Lewis’ dai­ly expe­ri­ences with hate on the job. As British troops dig through the ruins look­ing for the bod­ies of miss­ing peo­ple, they are reg­u­lar­ly tar­get­ed by Nazi young men in dis­guise who refuse to admit defeat. Clarke, adopt­ing a con­vinc­ing British accent, is touch­ing as a colonel who takes it upon him­self to give the ben­e­fit of the doubt to cit­i­zens that so many of his col­leagues would rather see shot.

Lewis’ pol­i­tics of for­give­ness and rec­on­cil­i­a­tion are at odds with the moti­va­tions of the British (and Amer­i­can) forces that bombed the city of Dres­den in 1945, where, we soon learn, Lubert’s wife was killed. Like Lewis, how­ev­er, the Ger­man wid­ow­er does not embrace the idea of revenge: he is a wel­com­ing host to the cou­ple whose coun­try is direct­ly respon­si­ble for his wife’s death.

With just these three char­ac­ters, The After­math thus ele­gant­ly builds a com­plex image of the con­tra­dic­tions and ten­sions at play dur­ing this spe­cif­ic time in his­to­ry. The pres­sure that all three pro­tag­o­nists are under feels gen­uine­ly affect­ing, as the film knows to linger on the moral­ly thorny and painful moments that its sto­ry entails. At no moment does it anx­ious­ly look for an easy way out of that dis­com­fort, or resort to emp­ty mes­sages of love and hope.

In fact, the film doesn’t ever resolve the moral conun­drum of the peri­od it rep­re­sents. Instead, the inge­nious script (by Joe Shrap­nel and Anna Water­house) works through issues of grief, blame, anger, love and betray­al by trans­pos­ing them to the more hum­ble scale of the three char­ac­ters’ pri­vate lives. In oth­er words, The After­math is a melodrama.

This genre lends itself well to ques­tions of pol­i­tics, and the per­son­al here remains firm­ly polit­i­cal. But the film also reg­u­lar­ly veers into erot­ic ter­ri­to­ry as the rela­tion­ship between Rachael and Ste­fan devel­ops into a full-blown affair. The effect is fun if a lit­tle jar­ring, although Skarsgård’s unde­ni­able (prac­ti­cal­ly unavoid­able) sex appeal, cou­pled with Franz Lustig’s gor­geous­ly sen­su­al cin­e­matog­ra­phy, smoothes out any wrinkles.

As their romance blooms, Rachael and Ste­fan appear increas­ing­ly self-absorbed, to an almost irri­tat­ing degree, which would be a flaw in most melo­dra­mas. Here, though, their self­ish­ness and myopia is pre­cise­ly the point of the sto­ry. Why are they try­ing to shut out the world by tak­ing refuge in an erot­ic fantasy?

The finale that the film aims for is so psy­cho­log­i­cal­ly sophis­ti­cat­ed and dev­as­tat­ing, it is almost daunt­ing to watch unfold. Up until this point, The After­math awk­ward­ly and blunt­ly alludes to the char­ac­ters’ hang-ups, which turn out to be so cru­cial to the emo­tion­al pow­er of the end­ing. Direc­tor James Kent hero­ical­ly sticks the land­ing, yet one can­not help but imag­ine what this mate­r­i­al could have been in the hands of a more skilled team.

You might like