Show Me The Picture: The Story of Jim Marshall | Little White Lies

Show Me The Pic­ture: The Sto­ry of Jim Marshall

31 Jan 2020 / Released: 31 Jan 2020

Black and white image of a man with curly hair sitting at a table, looking directly at the camera with a pensive expression.
Black and white image of a man with curly hair sitting at a table, looking directly at the camera with a pensive expression.
3

Anticipation.

Know the images, but not the man.

3

Enjoyment.

A thrilling ride through the ’60s and ’70s.

3

In Retrospect.

Human beings are vastly complex, and Marshall is no different.

A colour­ful por­trait of the famed photographer’s life, both behind and in front of the camera.

A tem­pes­tu­ous char­ac­ter with a dis­tinct sen­si­bil­i­ty, pho­tog­ra­ph­er Jim Mar­shall suc­cess­ful­ly encap­su­lat­ed 1960s and 70s Amer­i­ca in his pho­tog­ra­phy. Not only did he allow us entry into this trans­for­ma­tive and tumul­tuous peri­od in Amer­i­can his­to­ry, he also laid bare his soul in his work.

In Show Me The pic­ture: The Sto­ry of Jim Mar­shall, direc­tor Alfred George Bai­ley paints an even-hand­ed por­trait of a coarse yet sen­si­tive man. Bai­ley pays par­tic­u­lar atten­tion to Marshall’s uncan­ny abil­i­ty to cap­ture his sub­jects – name­ly musi­cians such as Bob Dylan, the Rolling Stones, Jef­fer­son Air­plane and Janis Joplin – with strik­ing candidness.

In a café in New York City’s West Vil­lage, Dylan is pic­tured with a dis­tinct calm­ness about him, cof­fee rest­ing atop a table as his wife sits across from him. There is a vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty and at-ease-ness about Dylan in Marshall’s images. Giv­en Dylan’s rep­u­ta­tion as a deeply pri­vate per­son, it’s telling that he appears com­plete­ly relaxed in Marshall’s pres­ence. This unob­tru­sive artistry extends through­out Marshall’s remark­able body of work; his pic­tures are evoca­tive in the truest sense of the word.

Yet this is not a sen­ti­men­tal or roman­tic biog­ra­phy, as Bai­ley makes a point of fore­ground­ing Marshall’s volatile nature, destruc­tive drug habit and brush­es with the law. Mar­shall may be the pho­to­graph­ic father of a zeit­geist but he is also flawed and com­pli­cat­ed (the film implies this may be symp­to­matic of a trou­bled child­hood, but pass­es no judge­ment). There is a poignant irony about a man attuned to the emo­tions of his sub­jects but not nec­es­sar­i­ly his own.

You might like