Nickel Boys review – a miracle of a movie | Little White Lies

Nick­el Boys review – a mir­a­cle of a movie

18 Dec 2024 / Released: 03 Jan 2025

Pensive Black man with serious expression in natural setting.
Pensive Black man with serious expression in natural setting.
5

Anticipation.

Anything from RaMell Ross is cause for celebration.

5

Enjoyment.

There are about a dozen of the best shots I have ever seen in a movie.

5

In Retrospect.

The defining American film of the 2020s.

With this adap­ta­tion of Col­son White­heads Pulitzer Prize-win­ning nov­el, film­mak­er RaMell Ross deliv­ers 2024’s most har­row­ing and tran­scen­dent film.

At one point in Nick­el Boys, Elwood, a young Black boy in Civ­il Rights-era Flori­da, glimpses Mar­tin Luther King Jr. in front of a super­mar­ket and takes off, run­ning across the mid­dle of the street to greet him.

Turn­er, his best friend, chas­es behind him. When he catch­es Elwood, he asks him what’s wrong. Elwood smiles, bash­ful. Turn­er looks over to see a card­board cut-out of MLK. We’ve encoun­tered the preach­er mul­ti­ple times in the film – on a vinyl record, through a win­dow dis­play of a dozen tele­vi­sions, from teach­ers who mis­quote his ser­mons. Yet for a moment, to Elwood, it looked like he was real­ly there, just a few feet away, next to the pro­duce stand in the mid­dle of some city street. The most bril­liant part of this scene is not the choice to lit­er­alise the two boy’s vast­ly dif­fer­ent rela­tion­ships to the most vis­i­ble, idolised black man in Amer­i­ca, nor is it the fact that this scene imme­di­ate­ly fol­lows the one time we will ever see both boys on-screen at the same time. It’s that, for a split-sec­ond, that cut-out real­ly does look like King.

The entire­ty of RaMell Ross’ nar­ra­tive fea­ture debut is shot in first-per­son. This is the kind of con­ceit that feels too exper­i­men­tal, too grandiose, to make it past a pitch meet­ing, let alone result in a suc­cess­ful film. Yet the first of many mir­a­cles of Nick­el Boys is that it exists, a $20 mil­lion movie with the kind of for­mal rigour typ­i­cal­ly reserved for under­ground and instal­la­tion art.

Ross’ fea­ture debut, the non-nar­ra­tive doc­u­men­tary Hale Coun­ty This Morn­ing, This Evening, pho­tographed con­tem­po­rary black life in the South­east­ern Unit­ed States with an unpar­al­leled impres­sion­is­tic inti­ma­cy and an envi­able knack for iden­ti­fy­ing and cap­tur­ing spon­ta­neous­ly beau­ti­ful imagery. That same ethos proves equal­ly fruit­ful here. His sec­ond film fol­lows Elwood (played by the mon­u­men­tal­ly gift­ed Ethan Herisse), an ide­al­is­tic teenage Free­dom Fight­er sent to the Nick­el reform school after being wrong­ful­ly arrest­ed for car theft.

The open­ing half-hour, how­ev­er, is a pro­ces­sion of loose­ly con­nect­ed vignettes from Elwood’s youth. Ross invites the audi­ence to embody Elwood through a sen­so­ry sim­u­la­tion. Dream­like moments of appar­ent hap­pen­stance, the kind nor­mal­ly found in an edit amidst hours of unused footage, are engi­neered whole­sale from Ross’ imag­i­na­tion, with a large- scale peri­od-accu­rate recre­ation of 1960s Tal­la­has­see to match. Ross com­pos­es such painter­ly shots in a way that feels con­jured from real mem­o­ries: a mag­net slid­ing down the ice­box door, two women’s legs mov­ing in per­fect uni­son at a shop counter, the sound of Elwood’s grand­moth­er scrap­ing icing off a knife with the ridges of a glass cake stand.

This foun­da­tion­al emo­tive lens grows increas­ing­ly more intri­cate as the film goes on, even­tu­al­ly becom­ing an ouroboros of vic­ar­i­ous expe­ri­ence attempt­ing to recon­struct the ghosts of a past that haunts those forced to relive it. The open­ing invites the audi­ence to embody a young Black boy, the polit­i­cal impli­ca­tions of which Ross pro­ceeds to delib­er­ate­ly subvert.

The first major devi­a­tion comes when Elwood first meets Turn­er (Bran­don Wil­son), and, in a flash, the audi­ence is final­ly allowed to see through a sec­ond pair of eyes, final­ly wit­ness­ing the boy we have hith­er­to only under­stood through the tilt of his own reti­nas. Turn­er is more cyn­i­cal than Elwood, hav­ing already run away once from Nick­el, with no fam­i­ly or future to speak of. The two form a deep friend­ship, a close­ness com­mu­ni­cat­ed. A less­er direc­tor would use this to cheat’ in more con­ven­tion­al filmmaking.

Ross instead uses their shared posi­tion­al­i­ty to inter­ro­gate the boys’ agency as they find them­selves rou­tine­ly anonymised and dehu­man­ised by the world around them.

The sec­ond depar­ture comes as Elwood is whipped by the academy’s own­er, the cam­era mov­ing out from first per­son and train­ing itself on the back of his skull, as if attached to a rig on his back. The world robs him, at this moment, of a per­spec­tive. Telling­ly, this angle appears again in the non-lin­ear inter­ludes which fol­low an old­er Elwood through­out the turn of the mil­len­ni­um, as rev­e­la­tions about the reform school become pub­lic knowl­edge dur­ing an investigation.

Based on the Pulitzer Prize-win­ning nov­el by Col­son White­head, Nick­el Boys is not, strict­ly speak­ing, a true sto­ry. The film, how­ev­er, draws heavy inspi­ra­tion from the Dozi­er School, where near­ly a hun­dred black boys were mur­dered up until 1973. The film, like Whitehead’s book, is deeply con­cerned with what it means, as a Black Amer­i­can artist, to share the sto­ries of those who have suf­fered under white suprema­cy, the ways that such a task requires fic­tion­al­is­ing and pro­ject­ing one­self onto strangers and loved ones alike. Ross grap­ples with the deper­son­al­i­sa­tion that comes not just from racialised vio­lence, but also the per­sis­tent obfus­ca­tion of the nation’s history.

Hands clasped together, fingers intertwined, against wooden surface, blue abstract background.

Through­out the film, Ross inter­cuts ephemer­al footage from across America’s past. These clips, though they osten­si­bly break the rules’ of the film, are as much a part of Elwood and Turner’s world­view as any drama­tised seg­ment. What is absent from Nick­el Boys, on the oth­er hand, is on-screen racialised violence.

Scenes such as the afore­men­tioned whip­ping instead opt for a kind of gru­elling mon­tage of audio­vi­su­al cacoph­o­ny and frac­tured digi­ti­sa­tions of con­tem­po­ra­ne­ous pho­tographs. Ross offers a damn­ing indict­ment of archival process that doc­u­ment acts of racism – the dearth and manip­u­la­tion of such images to fit digestible his­to­ri­ogra­phies deny the incom­pre­hen­si­ble truth of its own scale.

Were Nick­el Boys mere­ly a gal­vanis­ing accom­plish­ment in post-colo­nial essay film­mak­ing, that would be enough. It is dou­bly won­drous, then, that the film itself is a riv­et­ing­ly con­struct­ed, impres­sive­ly sub­tle work of dra­matur­gy. As a work of lit­er­ary adap­ta­tion, the script’s inge­nious devi­a­tions and abbre­vi­a­tions do won­ders to trans­late its ideas into the­atri­cal ana­logues. Often, the audi­ence is forced to ori­ent them­selves with­in a shot in media res, giv­ing the film a sur­pris­ing­ly propul­sive rhythm. Herisse and Wil­son sell the film; a movie like this could only work with two actors who can con­vince the lens itself that it’s some­body they know, some­body real, some­body they love. Most­ly, it’s just a real­ly good sto­ry, per­formed with con­sum­mate pathos and writ­ten with stag­ger­ing grace.

It is easy to make Nick­el Boys sound far sim­pler than it is. That it winds up a pro­found­ly acces­si­ble stu­dio film is not proof that its high-mind­ed aes­thet­ic and polit­i­cal ambi­tions have been neutered. Ross’ avant-garde imagery is so intu­itive that it buoys more straight­for­ward ele­ments of the piece with­out fore­go­ing aca­d­e­m­ic lucid­i­ty. Every dra­mat­ic manœu­vre and rev­e­la­tion with­in the plot is echoed and com­pli­cat­ed by the sur­round­ing visu­als. The result­ing effect is nei­ther instruc­tion­al or redun­dant; rather, the visu­als and the plot entwine as deft­ly and ele­gant­ly as I’ve ever seen in an Amer­i­can stu­dio picture.

Nick­el Boys remains a dizzy­ing­ly accom­plished, dense, and sear­ing dia­tribe on the dis­so­ci­a­tion inflict­ed upon the oppressed by insti­tu­tion­al vio­lence, the ways Amer­i­can soci­ety dehu­man­is­es and anonymis­es black men as dis­pos­able mar­tyrs. It is also, by mere fact of its release, a mon­u­men­tal­ly inspir­ing cin­e­mat­ic feat. Despite Ama­zon MGM clear­ly aim­ing for an awards push, Nick­el Boys prob­a­bly won’t win Best Pic­ture; every oth­er fron­trun­ner would be a more fash­ion­able choice. Yet I can­not imag­ine an Eng­lish-lan­guage film from this decade that will have a greater impact on future gen­er­a­tions, on the ways they under­stand filmic gram­mar and the pos­si­bil­i­ties of the medi­um. Nick­el Boys is a mas­ter­piece – more­over, it is a miracle.

You might like

Accessibility Settings

Text

Applies the Open Dyslexic font, designed to improve readability for individuals with dyslexia.

Applies a more readable font throughout the website, improving readability.

Underlines links throughout the website, making them easier to distinguish.

Adjusts the font size for improved readability.

Visuals

Reduces animations and disables autoplaying videos across the website, reducing distractions and improving focus.

Reduces the colour saturation throughout the website to create a more soothing visual experience.

Increases the contrast of elements on the website, making text and interface elements easier to distinguish.