Ismael’s Ghosts | Little White Lies

Ismael’s Ghosts

01 Jun 2018 / Released: 01 Jun 2018

Two women in black clothing, one with short dark hair and the other with long dark hair, sitting in a dimly lit room.
Two women in black clothing, one with short dark hair and the other with long dark hair, sitting in a dimly lit room.
3

Anticipation.

Early word from the Cannes premiere wasn’t great.

4

Enjoyment.

To nobody’s surprise, Desplechin keeps a lot of plates spinning effortlessly.

4

In Retrospect.

Where most contemporary films could stand to lose an hour, Desplechin’s latest could use an extra one.

Mar­i­on Cotil­lard and Char­lotte Gains­bourg vie for Matthieu Amalric’s affec­tions in this taut melodrama.

No one who’s ever encoun­tered the work of Arnaud Desplechin will be sur­prised by the writer/director’s habit of mash­ing togeth­er bits and pieces of repur­posed and retro­fit­ted mate­r­i­al. Ismael’s Ghosts, his tenth nar­ra­tive fea­ture since 1991, is ener­gised by the depth­less well of impa­tient beau­ty that fans of 2004’s Kings & Queen and 2008’s A Christ­mas Tale know well.

Will Desplechin ever make anoth­er mas­ter­piece like his idio­syn­crat­ic peri­od dra­ma Esther Kahn? Per­haps not, but the div­i­dends paid by his Math­ieu Amal­ric plays an addled yet high-octane cre­ative, unable to cope with chal­lenges mon­u­men­tal and mun­dane alike’ mode are more than satisfactory.

The first hour of Ismael’s Ghosts is dom­i­nat­ed by the sto­ry of alco­holic/in­som­ni­ac/pill-pop­ping film­mak­er Ismael Vuil­lard (also the name of the musi­cian Amal­ric played in Kings & Queen), who is more or less con­tent in a long-term rela­tion­ship with Sylvia (Char­lotte Gains­bourg), until the return of his long-lost wife Car­lot­ta (Mar­i­on Cotil­lard). Inti­ma­tions of the macabre hov­er about the place; in one moment the film recalls some off-kil­ter Ian McE­wan tale, the next it evokes the goth­ic edge of an Ing­mar Bergman sea­side melodrama.

Phan­toms that pro­duce unen­durable anx­i­eties for the film’s char­ac­ters are what Desplechin uses as a means to hitch one nar­ra­tive wag­on to the next. Ismael has main­tained a last­ing friend­ship with the father of his pre­sumed-dead wife, cel­e­brat­ed direc­tor Hen­ri Bloom (László Szabó, in a role that once would have been occu­pied by the late Desplechin stock play­er Jean-Paul Roussillon).

A person lying on a bed, being comforted by another person. Focused on soft skin tones and bedroom setting.

Bloom has been so ensconced in a sin­gle, famil­iar rut of incon­sola­bil­i­ty that, when he’s beset by the real­i­ty of his daughter’s return, has nowhere to turn to but abject grief and psy­chot­ic denial. On the flip side, Car­lot­ta strug­gles to cope with the fact that, while her father lives, the two are irrepara­bly estranged, as if see­ing each oth­er on the far side of a dream.

Ismael’s espi­onage screen­play, based on the imag­ined life of his for­eign-ser­vice broth­er (Louis Gar­rel), pro­vides still anoth­er prime mover for this slip­pery film. Craft­ing hilar­i­ous­ly inco­her­ent John le Carré boil­er­plate, Ismael turns his real and undoubt­ed­ly more ground­ed broth­er into a quick­sil­ver imp of diplo­mat­ic leg­end, a jit­tery savant, a pro­jec­tion of his own per­ma­nent live-wire state into a world he can only imag­ine in a binge of drunk cre­ativ­i­ty, nev­er few­er than three whiskeys deep at his lap­top, his ash­tray full.

Cam­er­a­work and cut­ting – even the occa­sion­al deploy­ment of brazen­ly expres­sion­ist light­ing effects – tell the tale of Desplechin’s own impa­tience (cou­pled with the implic­it trust he has in the audience’s abil­i­ty to keep up), flit­ting through sto­ry setups and dou­ble-backs with a weav­ing, stac­ca­to rhythm. A typ­i­cal Desplechin feint occurs when he stops to bur­row into a detail, a mem­o­ry or a pho­to­graph, the pace of the film seem­ing to flag only in the man­ner of bat­ed breath – a look before a leap.

We’re car­ried along by the exhil­a­rat­ing sen­sa­tion of a sto­ry­teller eter­nal­ly besieged by his own rest­less­ness, but served in equal mea­sure by an uncan­ny self-assur­ance. That Ismael’s Ghosts seems to exist simul­ta­ne­ous­ly on all its con­flict­ing planes may be an illu­sion, but a stub­born­ly per­sis­tent one.

You might like