Sick suburban solidarity in two unappreciated… | Little White Lies

Long Read

Sick sub­ur­ban sol­i­dar­i­ty in two unap­pre­ci­at­ed John Waters gems

12 Sep 2024

Words by Juan Barquin

While con­sid­ered by many to be minor works, Ser­i­al Mom and A Dirty Shame rep­re­sent some of our con­tem­po­rary con­cerns and anx­i­eties while offer­ing a sur­pris­ing­ly whole­some view of queer community.

There are few names in the his­to­ry of queer cin­e­ma that pro­voke as much of a glee­ful – or dis­gust­ed if you’re in polite soci­ety – reac­tion as John Waters. Over the decades, the man has gone from a mid­night movie trou­ble­mak­er to being a well-known celebri­ty of sorts, in no small part thanks to a bril­liant guest spot on The Simp­sons that queered many of the world’s chil­dren (includ­ing myself). His filth­i­est pic­tures (Pink Flamin­gos, Poly­ester) have been restored and cel­e­brat­ed, but those that came lat­er are often con­sid­ered less­er than his more provoca­tive ear­li­er works.

Ser­i­al Mom and A Dirty Shame are two such exam­ples and, arguably, are two of his best films in spite of their crit­i­cal and com­mer­cial fail­ure and, most impor­tant­ly, stu­dios that loathed what he’d made. Though they came ten years apart – one cel­e­brat­ing its thir­ti­eth anniver­sary this year, and the oth­er its twen­ti­eth – the pair are pitch-per­fect exten­sions of Waters’ brand of sub­ur­ban satire. They are the kind of films that, to some extent, present as main­stream” with­out actu­al­ly being designed for that kind of audi­ence, which is pre­cise­ly why the main­stream reject­ed them.

To tru­ly appre­ci­ate each one requires div­ing into what makes them trea­sures indi­vid­u­al­ly and what makes them rel­e­vant even today, and Ser­i­al Mom is an ide­al place to start. In his book, Mr. Know-It-All, Waters described the pic­ture to stu­dio execs as not the usu­al John Waters movie about crazy peo­ple in a crazy world, but a movie about a nor­mal per­son in a real­is­tic world doing the cra­zi­est thing of all as the audi­ence cheers her on!” This is exact­ly what Waters deliv­ers with Bev­er­ly Sut­phin, a play on the ide­al sit­com moth­er that Leave It To Beaver’s June Cleaver once rep­re­sent­ed, but with the twist being that she’s also a ser­i­al killer.

Ser­i­al Mom is designed to sub­vert expec­ta­tions of what nor­mal­cy” real­ly means and what that very idea can do to a per­son. Bev­er­ly, played by an exquis­ite Kath­leen Turn­er, is, as a char­ac­ter describes her, about as nor­mal and nice a lady as we’re ever going to find”. She’s also a foul-mouthed mur­der­er who will take out any­one who sets her off. These per­son­al­i­ties aren’t a rigid dichoto­my, Waters sug­gests, but rather two halves of a whole – the most abnor­mal peo­ple are those who present them­selves as pil­lars of prop­er society.

Prac­ti­cal­ly every one of the film’s scenes plays into this imbal­ance, with all of Beverly’s niceties being con­trast­ed by her sheer relent­less vil­lainy. Sure, she’s hap­py to make break­fast for every­one in the house­hold and recy­cles her garbage so well that the neigh­bor­hood trash col­lec­tors adore her for it, but she’s also will­ing to men­tal­ly tor­ture some­one via prank call for steal­ing a park­ing spot and mur­der some­one for not rewind­ing their VHS tapes (which, in fair­ness, is a crime). And Bev­er­ly, ulti­mate­ly, is some­one to root for in her crimes – she may be doing bad things, like hit­ting some­one with a phone for wear­ing white after Labor Day, but that ties into the twist­ed way we all some­times wish we could get away with a lit­tle ret­ri­bu­tion for our pet­ti­est grievances.

Per­haps the most inter­est­ing thing about Ser­i­al Mom isn’t Kath­leen Turner’s por­trait of a ser­i­al killer, but the way that this brand of vio­lence infil­trates every sin­gle facet of prop­er soci­ety” in Waters’ home­town and cin­e­mat­ic sta­ple Bal­ti­more. This is not lim­it­ed to the teenagers who watch Blood Feast and mas­tur­bate to Dead­ly Weapons, but extends to every­one in her vicin­i­ty. Take an estab­lish­ment that Waters has clear con­tempt for, the church itself, and how the pastor’s ser­mon amidst Berverly’s mur­der spree is about cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. They cite Jesus Christ him­self as some­one who would (or should) have spo­ken out against it in the midst of being pub­licly mur­dered, and a fool­ish pub­lic nods in agree­ment at such an inane state­ment all the while clutch­ing their pearls at mur­der hap­pen­ing in their hometown.

If any­thing, Ser­i­al Mom’s rel­e­vance has only increased ten­fold in the thir­ty years since it came out. It isn’t just in its eerie pre­dic­tion of the 90s media spec­ta­cle that was the OJ Simp­son case, (the film came out just two months pri­or to his arrest and sub­se­quent show­stop­ping tri­al) but in the way that true crime has become embed­ded in Amer­i­can cul­ture beyond any rea­son­able sense. The third act court case – as much a spec­ta­cle as Simpson’s – is not just a laugh riot, but a clear con­dem­na­tion of the way that peo­ple per­ceive those in the spot­light. It is some­thing of a time­less crit­i­cism, one made obvi­ous by the pres­ence of Patri­cia Hearst as a juror – her­self some­one who was per­ceived by the pub­lic as both vic­tim and mon­ster when she went through a pub­lic court case in the 1970s relat­ed to her kid­nap­ping by the Sym­bionese Lib­er­a­tion Army. At her guilty ver­dict, she famous­ly sighed, I nev­er had a chance” but Waters’ defen­dant bless­ed­ly did.

Let’s make a gore movie about mom, or, bet­ter yet, a TV series” – a line uttered by Beverly’s own son, before he begins to sell the rights to their life sto­ry for a TV movie – is an even more scathing cri­tique now than it was in 1994, as is Suzanne Somers’ cameo to play the fem­i­nist hero­ine” that is our mur­der­ous moth­er. We now exist in an era when every oth­er new stream­ing series is ded­i­cat­ed to explor­ing the tales of ser­i­al killers, from Ryan Murphy’s end­less col­lec­tion of true crime reen­act­ments (his lat­est, Mon­ster, first tack­ling Jef­frey Dah­mer and, now, the Menen­dez broth­ers) to prac­ti­cal­ly every sin­gle cold case (and some­times even open ones) get­ting its own doc­u­men­tary miniseries.

Woman wearing a grey sleeveless jumpsuit standing in a domestic kitchen.

Even in the face of such atroc­i­ties, peo­ple are drawn to crim­i­nal actions and behav­iors that are deemed insane. It’s hard not to think about how Bev­er­ly Sut­phin would be get­ting this kind of treat­ment her­self, with even Waters’ film wink­ing at the audi­ence through the open­ing text crawl that specif­i­cal­ly address­es it being based on a true sto­ry” (even though it cer­tain­ly was not). That peo­ple didn’t under­stand Ser­i­al Mom isn’t a total sur­prise, as Amer­i­cans are not espe­cial­ly fond of wit­ness­ing their own shame­less­ness, and Savoy Pic­tures hat­ing the fact that a mur­der­er got away with it feels like a rel­ic of a more cen­so­ri­ous era than the 1990s. But it’s the def­i­n­i­tion of a cult clas­sic that now gets screened reg­u­lar­ly on Mother’s Day, and a bril­liant pic­ture that con­tin­ues to age like fine wine.

Waters’ the­sis on Amer­i­can nor­mal­cy is tak­en to even greater extremes in A Dirty Shame, his final film” (pend­ing a come­back with his adap­ta­tion of his own nov­el, Liar­mouth), which is one of his most for­got­ten and under­rat­ed films that also hap­pens to be one of his absolute best come­dies. If Ser­i­al Mom was about play­ing up how even the most nor­mal peo­ple could hold mur­der­ous intent with­in them, A Dirty Shame was about show­ing how nat­ur­al it is to be abnormal.

From top to bot­tom (and vers), it’s a queer cin­e­mat­ic trea­sure about the way soci­ety tries to shut down any­one with an iden­ti­ty that is declared abnor­mal. It feels like Waters pur­pose­ly looked up every kink or sex­u­al act back in the ear­ly 2000s – bear cul­ture, cun­nilin­gus, adult baby dia­per lovers, splosh­ing, exhi­bi­tion­ism, mysophil­ia, mas­tur­ba­tion, good old fash­ioned three­somes – just to pop­u­late his film with things that the aver­age view­er would find shock­ing. And, well, that’s exact­ly what he did. While it isn’t much of a shock these days (or even back then for queer view­ers), it cer­tain­ly was for the MPAA, who brand­ed it with the dread­ed NC-17 rat­ing that cursed it to obliv­ion and a hor­ren­dous­ly recut the­atri­cal ver­sion. It is, how­ev­er, a com­plete­ly ridicu­lous film, a riotous lit­tle sex com­e­dy inspired by the sex­ploita­tion films that Waters loves and spliced into his own cin­e­ma (includ­ing Ser­i­al Mom).

The film cen­ters around two groups: neuters and apos­tles. The for­mer – proud­ly declar­ing that neuter means nor­mal” – are the kind of peo­ple who believe repres­sion is the only way to live. They’re will­ing to lock a young woman up in her child­hood bed­room sim­ply to stop her from embrac­ing her exhi­bi­tion­ist ways, they hand out fly­ers and rant about how per­verts are tak­ing over the neigh­bor­hood” and they hate any show­case of sex­u­al­i­ty, even down to just a sim­ple pub­lic dis­play of affec­tion like kiss­ing. Suzanne Shep­herd and Mink Stole lead the brigade as Big Ethel and Marge, with their cru­sade against sex­u­al deviants com­ing across as overt­ly idi­ot­ic. But in spite of its absur­di­ty, down to the idea of forc­ing a young woman to go on Prozac to calm her sex­u­al urges, this kind of behav­ior is ground­ed in reality.

Young woman with curly hair, in a pink top, sitting in an armchair.

Once again, Waters’ scathing crit­i­cism of soci­ety is at the fore­front of this film and taps into how cycli­cal this kind of behav­ior is. Big Ethel and Marge aren’t so far from the way that con­ser­v­a­tive politi­cians used (and con­tin­ue to use) to per­se­cute gay men with a nation­al plat­form and oth­ers would encour­age con­ver­sion ther­a­py to fix” queer peo­ple. Just as Ani­ta Bryant once ter­ror­ized Flori­da, now we have Ron DeSan­tis ban­ning queer edu­ca­tion and strip­ping trans peo­ple of their rights. This extends beyond the Unit­ed States, with even the Unit­ed King­dom play­ing host to some of the most vocal big­ots in the world, like JK Rowl­ing, who use their plat­form to harass trans peo­ple and pre­vent them from access­ing health­care. These peo­ple weaponize their per­ceived nor­mal­cy” against those who are not, and posi­tion any­thing remote­ly oth­er” as monstrous.

But Waters knows that this is untrue, and instead frames the oth­er as noth­ing but tru­ly immac­u­late. The apos­tles are the film’s true gems, with even the most annoy­ing of queer sub­cul­tures (bears, with all their grrs and woofs) being treat­ed as part of a holy col­lec­tive that will free these neuters from the shack­les of repres­sion. At its core is none oth­er than Ray-Ray, played by John­ny Knoxville, who serves as a Christ­like fig­ure who can not only resus­ci­tate peo­ple but bring them plea­sure beyond their com­pre­hen­sion. Where most films would shy away from empha­siz­ing that spread­ing love” can and should include through sex­u­al means and plea­sure”, Waters com­mits to show­ing that sex­u­al free­dom and embrac­ing one’s iden­ti­ty is the only way to be tru­ly liberated.

The moth­er-daugh­ter duo of Sylvia and Caprice Stick­les (the lat­ter bet­ter known as Ursu­la Udders), played by Tracey Ull­man and Sel­ma Blair respec­tive­ly, are a per­fect means of show­cas­ing the strug­gle between neuters and apos­tles. Every­thing about life in the normal/​neuter world is one of mis­ery, with the unhap­py Sylvia (who won’t even have sex with her hus­band, played by Chris Isaak) lit­er­al­ly lock­ing up her daugh­ter to ensure that she can’t go out danc­ing and show­ing off her crim­i­nal­ly enlarged breasts”. In her sad­ness, Caprice sits around watch­ing The Red Shoes and lament­ing that she can’t be out danc­ing to Bil­ly Lee Riley’s Red Hot”, show­ing off her body to a num­ber of men, includ­ing her biggest fan, Fat Fuck Frank. The moment she is lib­er­at­ed via acci­den­tal head injury (the film’s means of change”), Sylvia real­izes that this kind of treat­ment is a mis­take. And, while it sounds idi­ot­ic, there’s some­thing tru­ly sin­cere and love­ly about Sylvia and Caprice’s rela­tion­ship and the way that the two bond when embrac­ing their iden­ti­ties – one as a cun­nilin­gus bot­tom” (a title bestowed to her by Ray-Ray) and the oth­er as an exhibitionist.

That beau­ty extends to the way that A Dirty Shame plays into everyone’s favorite queer film trope of the found fam­i­ly”, as the apos­tles are all lov­ing and accept­ing of each other’s iden­ti­ties. Every sin­gle one of Ray-Ray’s fol­low­ers gets at least a brief moment to shine, their com­mit­ment to the bit extend­ing beyond just a chance to laugh at actors like Jack­ie Hoff­man mas­tur­bat­ing furi­ous­ly or Hearst (in her fifth Waters film appear­ance) hold­ing up a bot­tle of pop­pers in an attempt to save Ray-Ray from the sex nul­li­fy­ing pow­ers of Prozac. As much as Waters wants you to laugh at the jokes he’s pre­sent­ing, he’s also fair­ly com­mit­ted to the unit­ing pow­er that comes with bond­ing with oth­er weirdos.

Twen­ty years after A Dirty Shame’s release, queer peo­ple find them­selves faced with dis­course about respectabil­i­ty pol­i­tics. In an era where more and more iden­ti­ties are becom­ing part of the main­stream, and peo­ple have got­ten the chance to tru­ly con­nect and devel­op, queer peo­ple who are com­fort­able with the sta­tus quo find them­selves falling into the realm of the neuter. Rather than suc­cumb to the idio­cy that is No Kink at Pride”, with queer peo­ple will­ing to throw each oth­er under the bus for being too sex­u­al” at an event that cel­e­brates their lib­er­a­tion, A Dirty Shame presents an ide­al alter­na­tive: all kink at pride. Down to its very cli­max, in which every­one in Bal­ti­more has become a sex addict and Ray-Ray cli­max­es all over the world (and screen), John Waters is offer­ing a hand to all those who have ever felt per­se­cut­ed for their sex­u­al­i­ty, not only to come with him, but to cum with him.

As many have not­ed in the past, genius is nev­er appre­ci­at­ed in its time, and to look back at these two movies is to bear wit­ness to a genius at work. John Waters him­self has joked, Is it per­verse that I like my lat­er films bet­ter than the ear­ly ones that made me the King of Puke’?” and it’s easy to see why. It isn’t just as he says they’re eas­i­er to watch and the act­ing is bet­ter”, but, rather, that they’re gen­uine­ly great and dense films. Beneath all the goofy humor lies a real love, not just for the his­to­ry of art (both music and film espe­cial­ly, which Waters lib­er­al­ly ref­er­ences) but for the col­lec­tion of weirdos that he always places on screen. No mat­ter how nor­mal” they might seem at first, they’re all a lit­tle crazy and strange, and that’s what makes them so beau­ti­ful. To him, the char­ac­ters of Ser­i­al Mom and A Dirty Shame aren’t peo­ple to be looked down on or chas­tised, but to be cheered on in all their filthy, mon­strous ways, and there’s noth­ing more beau­ti­ful than that kind of rad­i­cal acceptance.

You might like

Accessibility Settings

Text

Applies the Open Dyslexic font, designed to improve readability for individuals with dyslexia.

Applies a more readable font throughout the website, improving readability.

Underlines links throughout the website, making them easier to distinguish.

Adjusts the font size for improved readability.

Visuals

Reduces animations and disables autoplaying videos across the website, reducing distractions and improving focus.

Reduces the colour saturation throughout the website to create a more soothing visual experience.

Increases the contrast of elements on the website, making text and interface elements easier to distinguish.