Is Psycho II the most misunderstood sequel ever… | Little White Lies

Home Ents

Is Psy­cho II the most mis­un­der­stood sequel ever made?

31 Jul 2017

Words by Anton Bitel

Middle-aged man in navy t-shirt stands on porch, looking at camera with a serious expression.
Middle-aged man in navy t-shirt stands on porch, looking at camera with a serious expression.
Richard Franklin’s fol­low-up to the Hitch­cock clas­sic is a chill­ing hor­ror in its own right.

See,” Mary Samuels (Meg Tilly) reas­sures Nor­man Bates (Antho­ny Perkins) after she has per­suad­ed him to enter his mother’s bed­room in the house on the hill above the Bates Motel. No ghosts.”

It’s 22 years since Nor­man was put away for sev­en mur­ders, which he had com­mit­ted while dressed as the moth­er whose own mum­mi­fied corpse he kept with him in the house for con­ver­sa­tion. Found not guilty on grounds of insan­i­ty, he has spent all this time locked away in an insti­tu­tion, but has now, thanks to the work of his psy­chi­a­trist Dr Bill Ray­mond (Robert Log­gia), been judged fit to return to soci­ety. And to return home, where he has tak­en in Mary while she seeks more per­ma­nent accommodation.

It’s also 23 years since Norman’s last killing spree appeared in Alfred Hitchcock’s Psy­cho, chang­ing the his­to­ry of hor­ror by trans­gress­ing all man­ner of then fixed moral bound­aries, and ush­er­ing in the slash­er sub­genre that would tru­ly hit its stride in the ear­ly 1980s. Now Nor­man is out again, and strug­gling to break free of the shack­les of his­to­ry – maybe even to forge him­self a new future with the younger, sym­pa­thet­ic Mary. Yet even as Mary insists that there are no ghosts, we see one: the shad­ow of Hitchcock’s famil­iar pro­file clear­ly cast (though unno­ticed by either Nor­man or Mary) over the long depart­ed Nor­ma Bates’ clos­et, in a posthu­mous ver­sion of one of the director’s famous cameos.

Of course, there are oth­er ghosts of the past haunt­ing poor Nor­man. We can see the con­flict in his face when­ev­er he is con­front­ed with the tools of his past killings – the key to Room 1, a knife, a tin of poi­soned tea – and in his smile, at once shy and warm but also con­spic­u­ous­ly crooked, as Perkins, back after so many years in his most (in)famous role, invests his char­ac­ter with a stut­ter­ing, awk­ward humanity.

Yet this time around, the tena­cious recur­rences of Norman’s trau­mat­ic his­to­ry are not mere­ly inter­nal. They come in the exter­nal form of Lila Loomis (Vera Miles, return­ing from the orig­i­nal), deter­mined that Nor­man should not get away with the mur­der of her sis­ter Mar­i­on Crane (whose noto­ri­ous death in the show­er is replayed in this sequel’s pro­logue); and of scuzzy motel man­ag­er War­ren Toomey (Den­nis Franz) who, when fired for turn­ing the estab­lish­ment, in Norman’s absence, into a drugs den and bor­del­lo, does not hes­i­tate to bait Nor­man with reminders of his sta­tus as a loony’ and psy­cho’.

And then there are the let­ters and phone calls that Nor­man receives, pur­port­ing to come from the moth­er who he knows is not only dead but also buried, yet whose pres­ence in the house even Mary starts to sense. It is clear that some­body is mess­ing with Nor­man. But then Nor­man is not the sort of per­son any­one should want to push back over the edge of sanity.

When­ev­er Nor­man, in answer­ing the tele­phone, realis­es (or per­haps imag­ines) that it is his moth­er on the oth­er end of the line, he can be seen switch­ing the receiv­er from one ear to the oth­er. It’s as good a visu­al sig­ni­fi­er as any that there are two sides to Nor­man – a man whose per­son­al­i­ty is split between his old mur­der­ous self from the 60s, and his reformed self in the 80s. It also marks a strange dual dynam­ic that Psy­cho II uses to divide its own viewer.

For while a part of us hopes that sweet, sen­si­tive, sin­cere Nor­man can stay on the straight and nar­row, and keep resist­ing those mur­der­ous urges and mater­nal fix­a­tions still clos­et­ed deep with­in him, the oth­er part – the depraved, voyeuris­tic, per­verse part – sim­ply wish­es to see the old Nor­man back, dressed in drag and stab­bing with aban­don the way he did when we first fell so dark­ly in love with him. The beau­ty of the film is that its ten­sions play both sides simul­ta­ne­ous­ly, leav­ing us unsure which way Nor­man will turn, or indeed which way we want him to turn. As the twist-heavy nar­ra­tive bends us this way and that, it also con­fronts us with our own errant desires.

In 1982, Robert Bloch pub­lished a sequel to his 1959 nov­el Psy­cho’, which had inspired Hitchcock’s film. Bloch’s Psy­cho II’ kills Nor­man off ear­ly, and focus­es most of its ener­gies on satiris­ing Hollywood’s love of exploit­ing real-life acts of rape and mur­der to sen­sa­tion­alise its cin­e­mat­ic pro­duc­tions. Unsur­pris­ing­ly, Uni­ver­sal Pic­tures baulked at the direc­tion in which Bloch had tak­en the prop­er­ty, and hired writer Tom Hol­land to cre­ate an entire­ly sep­a­rate film sequel.

The result is Psy­cho II, direct­ed by Ozploita­tion lumi­nary Richard Franklin, which the stu­dio expect­ed to be a small made-for-cable pro­duc­tion, with Christo­pher Walken under con­sid­er­a­tion for the role of Nor­man. But no soon­er had Perkins read Holland’s screen­play than he insist­ed on repris­ing his part, at which point the film’s pro­file was raised inestimably.

Like its con­fused pro­tag­o­nist, the Psy­cho fran­chise is essen­tial­ly a prod­uct of the rel­a­tive­ly gen­teel post­war peri­od that had been put away for decades and then released, dazed and blink­ing, into the very dif­fer­ent age and ethos of the 80s, afford­ing us a glimpse into how times and val­ues had since changed. Hitchcock’s mono­chrome (seen in the open­ing sequence) here gives way to full colour. There is, in the din­er where Nor­man briefly takes a job under kind­ly Emma Spool (Clau­dia Bryar), the incon­gru­ous sight of our old-world anti-hero walk­ing past Bat­tle­zone and Ms Pac­man arcade machines.

Psycho’s on-screen flush­ing toi­let, with­out main­stream prece­dent when the film was released in 1960, is here replaced by one that mess­i­ly pours gey­sers of blood all over the bath­room floor. The show­er scene, edit­ed as a game of peek-a-boo that painstak­ing­ly avoids show­ing either Mar­i­on Crane’s parts’ or indeed any actu­al pen­e­tra­tion of phal­lic blade into flesh, is here vogu­ish­ly updat­ed to reveal explic­it flash­es of Mary’s T&A – and the deaths, when they come, are graph­ic and gory in a way that would not have been pos­si­ble in 1960.

Yet in many ways, Psy­cho II stays true to Hitchcock’s orig­i­nal. It is not just the return of Hop­kins and Miles, and those icon­ic sets of motel, house and swamp, but also Jer­ry Goldsmith’s dra­mat­ic score (pay­ing respect­ful homage to Bernard Her­rmann), and DP Dean Cundey’s love of dutch tilts, swoop­ing cranes and god’s‑eye-view high-angle shots, set­ting our view of every­thing off kil­ter as though we are observ­ing events from a per­spec­tive dreamt up by Nor­man him­self (who fan­cies that he is always under the watch­ful eye of his mother).

And of course there is the way that the plot inex­orably manoeu­vres Nor­man, so eager for improve­ment, alter­ation and mod­erni­sa­tion, right back to where he was when we first met him in Hitchcock’s film. Last­ly there is Franklin’s con­sum­mate han­dling of sus­pense, black humour and sev­er­al par­a­digm-shift­ing twists, mak­ing this a wor­thy sequel to the orig­i­nal, and a con­vinc­ing evo­ca­tion of the old master’s ghost.

Psy­cho II is released by Arrow on Blu-ray on 31 July, 2017.

You might like

Accessibility Settings

Text

Applies the Open Dyslexic font, designed to improve readability for individuals with dyslexia.

Applies a more readable font throughout the website, improving readability.

Underlines links throughout the website, making them easier to distinguish.

Adjusts the font size for improved readability.

Visuals

Reduces animations and disables autoplaying videos across the website, reducing distractions and improving focus.

Reduces the colour saturation throughout the website to create a more soothing visual experience.

Increases the contrast of elements on the website, making text and interface elements easier to distinguish.