The prescient politics of GW Pabst’s anti-war… | Little White Lies

Home Ents

The pre­scient pol­i­tics of GW Pabst’s anti-war films

28 Jan 2018

Words by Patrick Nabarro

A black and white image showing a military officer standing amidst debris and fallen soldiers on a battlefield.
A black and white image showing a military officer standing amidst debris and fallen soldiers on a battlefield.
In West­front 1918 and Kam­er­ad­schaft, the Aus­tri­an direc­tor inter­ro­gates the slip­pery notion of nationalism.

In today’s increas­ing­ly fraught polit­i­cal cli­mate – at a time when the UK is prepar­ing to with­draw from the Euro­pean Union, when a far-right can­di­date placed a close sec­ond in France’s pres­i­den­tial elec­tion, and when Austria’s iron­i­cal­ly named Free­dom Par­ty rose to pow­er – it feels espe­cial­ly time­ly that Cri­te­ri­on should be releas­ing the clas­sic anti-nation­al­ist films of for­got­ten Ger­man mas­ter Georg Wil­helm Pabst.

The first of those, West­front 1918, from 1930, is a stag­ger­ing anti-war para­ble and more than a match in con­tent for that oth­er high­ly cel­e­brat­ed World War One lament, Lewis Milestone’s All Qui­et on the West­ern Front. Pabst’s film, though, comes with the impor­tant caveat of being a far rich­er piece of work cin­e­mato­graph­i­cal­ly. Released one year lat­er, Kam­er­ad­schaft (lit­er­al­ly Com­rade­ship’), saw Pab­st con­tin­ue his reflec­tions on social­ism and the theme of inter­na­tion­al coop­er­a­tion by cel­e­brat­ing the col­lab­o­ra­tive spir­it of a group of Ger­man work­ers who saved French min­ers trapped after a cat­a­stroph­ic under­ground explo­sion in the dis­put­ed Ruhr territory.

Pabst’s rel­a­tive obscu­ri­ty real­ly is some­thing of a trav­es­ty. Iron­i­cal­ly enough for a film­mak­er whose best work inter­ro­gates the slip­pery notion of nation­al iden­ti­ty, his rep­u­ta­tion suf­fered in part due to a spell in the 1940s when he returned to Ger­many from an abortive spell in Hol­ly­wood, where he made two films under the aus­pice of the Third Reich. Pabst’s col­lu­sive spir­it here has been open to con­jec­ture. If any­thing, he has been maligned as much by asso­ci­a­tion, and the sheer empa­thet­ic spir­it of his two social­ist paeans a decade ear­li­er deserves to be the main lega­cy of his con­tri­bu­tion to world cinema.

The beau­ty of Pabst’s cin­e­ma is that it com­bines all the skill and expres­sion­is­tic vir­tu­os­i­ty of fel­low Ger­man mas­ter, FW Mur­nau, with an aching sense of com­pas­sion. West­front 1918 and Kam­er­ad­schaft were also Pabst’s first sound films, and, par­tic­u­lar­ly in the for­mer, the direc­tor pro­vides an incred­i­ble sen­so­ry impres­sion of the hor­rors of trench war­fare. Arriv­ing 70 years before Steven Spielberg’s much-laud­ed D‑Day land­ings sequence in Sav­ing Pri­vate Ryan (which, inci­den­tal­ly, runs dan­ger­ous­ly close to war porn”, as the con­ceit of the tech­ni­cal repli­ca­tion of its land­ings was ulti­mate­ly in ser­vice to a very con­ser­v­a­tive and patri­ot­ic view of Amer­i­can sac­ri­fice), Pabst’s haunt­ing evo­ca­tion of the omnipres­ence of whistling bombs and thud­ding explo­sions offers its audi­ence no such pat consolations.

There real­ly was noth­ing prim­i­tive about Pabst’s under­stand­ing of the medi­um. If his rev­o­lu­tion­ary use of sound wasn’t enough, then his com­mand of cin­e­matog­ra­phy was extra­or­di­nary. His track­ing shot of the trench­es in West­front 1918 is a mas­ter­piece of logis­ti­cal plan­ning and pic­to­r­i­al clar­i­ty; he envi­sions the front­line as a liv­ing hell, a cesspit of apoc­a­lyp­tic des­o­la­tion. In Kam­er­ad­schaft, Pab­st con­jures a remark­able track­ing shot to show the path of the fire that torch­es through the tun­nels of the mines before reach­ing the hap­less French work­ers. Much like with the trench­es scene in West­front 1918, this shot is emblem­at­ic of the absolute malig­nan­cy of dis­cord in inter­na­tion­al rela­tions, as the infer­no comes about through the French and Ger­man offi­cials build­ing a gate between the mines and ignor­ing the warn­ings about the real (and metaphor­i­cal) risk of fire.

Pol­i­tics is the most salient aspect of West­front 1918 and Kam­er­ad­schaft though. And Pab­st is, in many ways, an apt com­men­ta­tor for this. He was born in Raud­nitz, Bohemia, a town which became part of Ger­many after Hitler’s 1938 Anschluss with Aus­tria (it is now part of the Czech Repub­lic). This mal­leable, arbi­trary notion of the foun­da­tions of nation­al iden­ti­ty plays a large part in both films. Kam­er­ad­schaft fea­tures actors speak­ing in both their French and Ger­man tongues despite this being an unusu­al prac­tice for a 1931 fea­ture film. Pab­st was adamant that all native lan­guages must remain undubbed so as to aid authen­tic­i­ty and con­vey the film’s mes­sage of inter­na­tion­al cooperation.

West­front 1918 is sim­i­lar­ly a multi­na­tion­al, mul­ti­lin­gual film. In fact, its open­ing sequence is expert in reveal­ing the abstract irrel­e­vance of lines on a map as we are thrust into an uproar­i­ous, con­vivial bar room scene fea­tur­ing var­i­ous French, Pruss­ian and Bavar­i­an char­ac­ters (let’s not for­get that Ger­many is but a nation of small­er nations). It is only when a bomb jar­ring­ly explodes, off-screen, that the con­text to the sto­ry and these char­ac­ters’ lives is allowed to intrude on the nar­ra­tive: that this is the dying embers of World War One.

Pabst’s clear dis­taste for the off­shoots of nation­al­ist ide­ol­o­gy, as revealed in these two films, became known as New Objec­tiv­i­ty”, although Joseph Goebbels con­sid­ered Pabst’s work paci­fist and defeatist. Pabst’s pol­i­tics were not only defined by nation­al par­a­digms but by his social­ist beliefs too. Beneath the fab­ric of both West­front 1918 and Kam­er­ad­schaft are depic­tions of the work­ing-class as the true vic­tims of exploita­tive, unchecked nation­al­ism. In Kam­er­ad­schaft, which is set in the imme­di­ate after­math of World War One, the French-Ger­man bor­der is closed to the unem­ployed seek­ing work in the coal mines which are ran­dom­ly dot­ted on either side of the divid­ing line.

In West­front 1918, when the pro­tag­o­nist, Karl (Gus­tav Diessl), returns to the home­land on indef­i­nite leave, he finds a Ger­many beset by eco­nom­ic insta­bil­i­ty, pover­ty and queues for food. This even pro­vides the con­text to his wife’s infi­deli­ty – hunger had dri­ven her into the arms of a local shop own­er. Back at the front­line, when Karl slow­ly begins to appre­ci­ate and under­stand the sheer depri­va­tion that must have caused his wife to com­mit adul­tery, he is denied a chance at redemp­tion by the cru­el­ties of war in a sim­ply mes­mer­ic close-up in the film’s final moments.

It is in cli­mac­tic scenes of both films that the pre­science of Pabst’s pol­i­tics real­ly stands out. In Kam­er­ad­schaft, while the French and Ger­man min­ers up above share a joint ral­ly cel­e­brat­ing their new­found com­rade­ship, the offi­cers down below are erect­ing the same gate divid­ing both coun­tries that was the cause of the acci­dent in the first place. And in West­front 1918, with the cen­tral char­ac­ters hav­ing capit­u­lat­ed to mad­ness or death in a makeshift sana­to­ri­um, the famil­iar clos­ing sub­ti­tle The End’ flash­es up on screen, with an added stroke of punc­tu­a­tion – a ques­tion mark – imply­ing the like­li­hood of soci­ety learn­ing the les­son of ram­pant nation­al­ism as minimal.

West­front 1918 and Kam­er­ad­schaft are avail­able on spe­cial edi­tion Blu-ray and DVD on 30 Jan­u­ary via cri​te​ri​on​.com

You might like