How Wes Anderson’s families helped me recover… | Little White Lies

How Wes Anderson’s fam­i­lies helped me recov­er from the break­down of my own

18 Mar 2017

Words by Hannah Strong

Three well-dressed men seated in a brightly coloured, ornate railway carriage.
Three well-dressed men seated in a brightly coloured, ornate railway carriage.
The Whit­mans, the Tenen­baums and oth­ers lift­ed my spir­its at a time when it seemed noth­ing could.

My child­hood was mea­sured in break­downs. When I was eight, my mum near­ly died hav­ing a liv­er tumour removed. I was 13 when I start­ed see­ing a psy­chi­a­trist, and 14 when my par­ents got divorced. I didn’t see my dad very much after he left, and my men­tal health rapid­ly dete­ri­o­rat­ed as our fam­i­ly implod­ed. I was ter­mi­nal­ly unwell – every­thing was greyscale, all sound reduced to the dull thud of a ten­sion headache.

Film was my escape, my way of leav­ing the skin I hat­ed and flee­ing to some­place else. When I think back on being a teenag­er with the world cor­rod­ing around me, I remem­ber watch­ing Wes Ander­son films. I could iden­ti­fy with his char­ac­ters’ des­per­ate melan­choly, but more than that, those fam­i­ly por­traits helped me to heal when I need­ed it the most.

Be it the lit­er­al (the Tenen­baums and the Whit­mans) or found (the staff of the Grand Budapest Hotel or the crew of the Bela­fonte), Anderson’s fam­i­lies are rarely hap­py, but I under­stand now that all the best sto­ries come out of dark places. His films con­front dif­fi­cult themes like death and men­tal ill­ness with raw frank­ness at odds with his care­ful­ly stylised scenery, and parental and sib­ling rela­tion­ships are inte­gral to these stories.

Every­thing about Anderson’s films reminds me of home – strange, giv­en that I grew up on a sink estate in the north of Eng­land, in a house too small for its four occu­pants and the hand­ful of ani­mals also resid­ing there at any giv­en time. Even so, I hear it in his sound­tracks, remem­ber­ing The Rolling Stones blast­ing from Dad’s hifi and Simon & Gar­funkel war­bling in the kitchen while Mum made din­ner, the music he uses trans­port­ing me to a time and place. Most of all, I see it in Anderson’s fam­i­lies – groups of odd­balls and mis­fits just like the one I belong to.

Con­sid­er Gene Hackman’s patri­arch in The Roy­al Tenen­baums. Roy­al is absent and neglect­ful like the father I had, but he at least made some (belat­ed, mis­guid­ed) effort to con­nect with his chil­dren, like the father I wished I’d had. Sim­i­lar to Mr Tenen­baum, my father nev­er real­ly want­ed to be a father, and only took a pater­nal inter­est when one of us showed some apti­tude for the things that he enjoyed: camp­ing, rock music, church. I was the Richie of my fam­i­ly, the only one invit­ed on excur­sions, my father’s daugh­ter until he moved out. A failed child prodi­gy wrestling with the pain of grow­ing up unre­mark­able, sui­ci­dal thoughts threat­en­ing to become actions.

I always under­stand Eli Cash’s des­per­ate yearn­ing to belong when he says, I always want­ed to be a Tenen­baum,” but it wasn’t until I gained the per­spec­tive of time that I under­stood Roy­al Tenenbaum’s reply: Me too, me too.” Those four words revealed the frailty of father­hood – he was ulti­mate­ly a weak man, try­ing too late to right his wrongs. His chil­dren turned out just fine with­out him, or at least, as fine as you can be when you realise the painful truth: your par­ents are human, as flawed and lim­it­ed as every­one else. Chil­dren build them up to be so much more inside their head.

Group of adults and children wearing casual and formal attire, with a bird of prey in the background.

In The Dar­jeel­ing Lim­it­eds Whit­man broth­ers I saw my rela­tion­ship with my own sib­lings: touch­ing from a dis­tance, bick­er­ing between our­selves. They didn’t under­stand my men­tal ill­ness; I didn’t under­stand their autism. In the mid­dle of an almost slap­stick fight, an upset Fran­cis Whit­man shouts accus­ing­ly: You don’t love me!” to which his broth­ers Peter and Jack reply Yes I do!” and I love you too, but I’m gonna mace you in the face!”

That’s how I feel about my sib­lings: I love them, but some­times I want to mace them in the face. We’ve only come close to under­stand­ing each oth­er while lead­ing entire­ly sep­a­rate lives. Like the Whit­mans, I think dis­tance helped our rela­tion­ship – it enabled us to gain some much need­ed breath­ing space. We still fight. When I call Mum, I can often hear her ref­er­ee­ing argu­ments in the back­ground between my broth­er and sis­ter (who are now 26 and 22). When I go home we still nee­dle at each oth­er in the way only broth­ers and sis­ters can. We don’t talk about Dad, or how dif­fi­cult I made life when we were grow­ing up, but I feel it. We’re bound by our shared expe­ri­ence and all the pain that went with it.

So much of Anderson’s vision revolves around the small­est details in the worlds he cre­ates, and how these turn a char­ac­ter sketch into a human being. Chas Tenenbaum’s Dal­ma­t­ian mice, Suzy Bishop’s binoc­u­lars – those tiny par­tic­u­lars reflect­ed to me the minu­ti­ae of my own life, and it’s those things I find myself return­ing to, time and time again. I pic­ture Dad’s heavy met­al CDs, my sister’s pet snails, my brother’s col­lec­tion of Lego mini-fig­ures. You have those micro-mem­o­ries too, sin­gu­lar as your fin­ger­prints, mak­ing up the detri­tus in a por­trait of your home. Anderson’s way of cap­tur­ing these moments taught me to cling to the small mem­o­ries; those tiny, hap­py parts of big, sad situations.

At their heart, Anderson’s films are char­ac­ter stud­ies about odd peo­ple in pecu­liar cir­cum­stances. This is always how I saw my own fam­i­ly, and I saw myself in Richie Tenenbaum’s sui­ci­dal iner­tia and Max Fischer’s awk­ward nav­i­ga­tion of ado­les­cence. In Anderson’s char­ac­ters, everyone’s neu­roses are not only put on dis­play but seem to be cel­e­brat­ed – it’s like Mrs Fox says, refer­ring to her hus­band: We’re all dif­fer­ent. Espe­cial­ly him. But there’s some­thing kind of fan­tas­tic about that, isn’t there?” Those lit­er­al or found fam­i­ly units make tragedy eas­i­er to sur­vive. His char­ac­ters made me feel less self-con­scious about my own strange­ness, and lift­ed my spir­its at a time when I thought noth­ing ever could or would.

In Anderson’s odd­ball fam­i­lies, I came to appre­ci­ate what was left of my own, and in their neat end­ings, I found the clo­sure I needed.

You might like