Remembering the time Jack Nicholson played Jimmy… | Little White Lies

Remem­ber­ing the time Jack Nichol­son played Jim­my Hoffa

07 Nov 2019

Words by Christopher Inoa

A group of men in 1940s attire, including a man in a tweed coat and another in a flat cap, standing together in a serious, sombre expression.
A group of men in 1940s attire, including a man in a tweed coat and another in a flat cap, standing together in a serious, sombre expression.
Before The Irish­man there was Dan­ny DeVito’s 1992 biopic of the noto­ri­ous labour union boss.

Jack Nichol­son end­ed the 1980s with his rep­u­ta­tion as one of the biggest stars in Hol­ly­wood in tact, steal­ing the show in both George Miller’s The Witch­es of East­wick and Tim Burton’s Bat­man. Then the ear­ly 90s brought back-to-back flops in the shape of Chi­na­town sequel The Two Jakes and messy roman­tic com­e­dy Man Trou­ble. Despite this, Nichol­son still had enough clout to secure a $10 mil­lion dol­lar pay­day and a Christ­mas release date for his next lead­ing role – but he des­per­ate­ly need­ed to deliv­er anoth­er big awards-wor­thy performance.

It was with added inter­est, then, that he took on the part of Jim­my Hof­fa in the 1992 biopic of the infa­mous labour union leader. Set on 30 July, 1975 – the date of his mys­te­ri­ous dis­ap­pear­ance – and told via a series of flash­backs, Hof­fa boast­ed a size­able bud­get ($50 mil­lion), a screen­play by David Mamet, and was direct­ed by one of the hottest tal­ents around, Dan­ny DeVito.

For those only famil­iar with DeVito’s more recent out­put, the idea of the Trash­man direct­ing Oscar-bait must seem ludi­crous. But DeVito’s career behind the cam­era was on the rise at the turn of the 1990s thanks to the suc­cess of his first two fea­tures Throw Mom­ma off The Train and The War of the Roses.

The New York Times declared him the new Robert Red­ford”; Joe Roth, for­mer head of 20th Cen­tu­ry Fox’s film divi­sion, went as far as to put DeVi­to in the same league as Fran­cis Ford Cop­po­la, telling the LA Times, direct­ing movies is in his blood.” DeVi­to seemed to buy into his own hype, telling the same paper, it’s like I’m in the mid­dle of the square with this big slab of mar­ble and the Medicis say, Look, we could’ve giv­en this to Michelan­ge­lo or Da Vin­ci. But we’re gonna let you take a whack at it instead.’’’

With Mar­tin Scorsese’s The Irish­man fast approach­ing, now seems as good a time as any to reflect on DeVito’s tran­si­tion from comedic actor to major film­mak­er and to reeval­u­ate a film which was billed as a come­back vehi­cle for Nichol­son but wound up meet­ing a sim­i­lar grim fate as its subject.

While Hof­fa was first por­trayed on screen in 1983, when Robert Blake played him in the TV movie Blood Feud, plans of bring­ing the fiery pub­lic fig­ure to cin­e­mas were in place as ear­ly as 1961. Accord­ing to a piece in The Inde­pen­dent in The Inde­pen­dent, 20th Cen­tu­ry Fox pro­duc­er Jer­ry Wald was keen to adapt Robert Kennedy’s 1961 nov­el The Ene­my With­in’ (which we see Nichol­son read­ing at the film’s cli­max), with On The Water­front screen­writer Budd Schul­berg hand-picked to pro­vide the script.

But before pro­duc­tion got under­way, the stu­dio pulled out, with Schul­berg stat­ing, a Team­sters’ hench­man walked into the stu­dio chief’s office and announced that, if the film was pro­duced, dri­vers would refuse to deliv­er prints to cin­e­mas, and any audi­ences would be dri­ven from their seats by stink-bomb attacks.” Inter­est from Colum­bia Pic­tures short­ly after was quick­ly dwin­dled due to actions from Hoffa’s lawyers.

Almost three decades lat­er, Joseph Isgro, a high­ly suc­cess­ful music pro­mot­er with ties to organ­ised crime, was approached by Frank Ragano, a for­mer lawyer for Hof­fa, and Brett O’Brien, son of Hoffa’s adopt­ed son, Charles Chuck­ie” O’Brien (played in The Irish­man by Jesse Ple­mons). They want­ed Isgro to fund a movie based on Hoffa’s life, and he agreed. I real­ly iden­ti­fied with Hoffa’s plight,” Isgro told the LA Times in 1993. He had a lot of run-ins with the law and I could relate to the kind of gov­ern­ment pres­sure he was sub­ject­ed to.” Isgro was charged and indict­ed on over 50 counts of rack­e­teer­ing, mail fraud and oth­er pay­ola-relat­ed crimes in 1989, all of which were dismissed.

Robert Moore, author of The French Con­nec­tion’, penned a screen­play based on Chuckie’s time with Hof­fa and sep­a­rate inter­views with oth­er Hof­fa asso­ciates, but the deal unrav­eled because, accord­ing to Isgro, Ragano and O’Brien did not pos­sess the rights to show Hoffa’s life on screen. So the pro­mot­er made a sep­a­rate deal, caus­ing both Ragano and O’Brien to sue Isgro (both cas­es were lat­er settled).

A man in a tuxedo holds a gun, standing in an elegant setting with dim lighting and people in the background.

Isgro sold his ver­sion of Hof­fa to pro­duc­er Andrew Press­man, who bro­kered a deal with 20th Cen­tu­ry Fox. Press­man was unsat­is­fied with Moore’s draft and reached out to Mamet, fresh off direct­ing his debut fea­ture, House of Games. Press­man was unsure he would be able to get Mamet on board, but being the son of a labor lawyer he jumped at the chance to write a film about Hoffa.

Once Mamet’s script was com­plete, the stu­dio approached a host of direc­tors includ­ing John McTier­an, Oliv­er Stone and Bar­ry Levin­son. Accord­ing to Den­nis McDougal’s book on Nichol­son, Five Easy Decades’, DeVi­to first heard about Hof­fa dur­ing lunch with Roth before a trip to Europe. When Roth men­tioned a script based on Hoffa’s life was in devel­op­ment, DeVi­to imme­di­ate­ly expressed inter­est, only to return to Hol­ly­wood and learn that Fox had already offered the job to Levin­son. I start scream­ing and yelling,” he tells McDou­gal, espe­cial­ly when I hear that Bar­ry Levin­son was at some [exple­tive] par­ty and when he said he was inter­est­ed in the script, they sent it to him!”

In the midst of his rage, DeVi­to received a call from none oth­er than Levin­son, who want­ed to talk about Tin Men, the 1987 film which he direct­ed and DeVi­to starred in (which hap­pened to be play­ing on tele­vi­sion). DeVi­to, non­cha­lant­ly, request­ed to take a look at Mamet’s script, but Levin­son informed his friend that he was read­ing through it and expressed his admi­ra­tion for Mamet, seem­ing­ly doom­ing DeVito’s chances. Luck­i­ly for DeVi­to, Levin­son even­tu­al­ly stepped aside.

As for who would play Hof­fa, Press­man had two actors in mind: Robert DeNiro, and the actor who would end up play­ing him 27 years lat­er, Al Paci­no. Both passed on the role. DeVi­to only saw one per­son play­ing his and Mamet’s ver­sion of Hof­fa. “[Nichol­son] knew I had the script in 89, and I real­ly both­ered him about it,” DeVi­to recalls in McDougal’s book. Grow­ing impa­tient at Nicholson’s reluc­tance to con­sid­er the part, DeVi­to decid­ed to take mat­ters into his own hands, sneak­ing into Nicholson’s estate at night, script in hand, and wait­ing out­side his win­dow. He opened the cur­tains of his house in Los Ange­les one morn­ing; he looks down, does a dou­ble take, and I’m stand­ing there ask­ing and begging.”

Nichol­son took the part, wear­ing a pros­thet­ic nose, hair­piece and fake tooth to more close­ly resem­ble Hof­fa, and, like Paci­no, lis­ten­ing to record­ings of Hof­fa in order to ful­ly immerse him­self in the char­ac­ter. It’s said that Hoffa’s own son did a dou­ble take when he vis­it­ed the set and saw Nichol­son dressed like his father.

The film’s harsh­est crit­ic was Ronald Gold­farb, Bob­by Kennedy’s col­league in the US Jus­tice Depart­ment, who called the film total trash”, con­demn­ing it for por­tray­ing his for­mer boss as a wimpy, nerdy, spoilt brat.” Hoffa’s son also didn’t approve, stat­ing in no uncer­tain terms, I didn’t like [the film]; they didn’t depict who he was.”

Crit­i­cal reviews of the film were mixed. Owen Gilber­man of Enter­tain­ment Week­ly called it turgid” and described Nicholson’s per­for­mance as all swag­ger and no depth.” Des­son Howe of The Wash­ing­ton Post called Hof­fa, the emp­ti­est pres­tige pic­ture of the year.” The film had its defend­ers, main­ly Roger Ebert, who wrote that the film, shows DeVi­to as a gen­uine film­mak­er.” Vin­cent Can­by of The New York Times, praised it for deliv­er­ing, a bit­ter­ly skep­ti­cal edge that is rare in Amer­i­can movies.”

Hof­fa did receive two Oscar nom­i­na­tions, for Stephen H Burum’s cin­e­matog­ra­phy and Ve Neill’s make­up work, but it was a box office bomb, gross­ing a measly $6.6 mil­lion dol­lars on its open­ing week­end and end­ing up with a total of $35 mil­lion, a $15 mil­lion loss. DeVi­to went on to direct just a few more fea­tures, includ­ing the cult clas­sics Matil­da and Death to Smoochy, while the big awards-wor­thy per­for­mance Nichol­son was look­ing for arrived in A Few Good Men the same year. In Patrick McGilligan’s biog­ra­phy of Nichol­son, he writes of the actor’s dis­ap­point­ment with how Hof­fa turned out: Nichol­son believed he had scored anoth­er touch­down [but] Hol­ly­wood had moved the goal­posts past him.”

Both Nichol­son and Paci­no deliv­er chest thump­ing per­for­mances, exud­ing a take-no-pris­on­ers atti­tude that was syn­ony­mous with Hof­fa him­self. How­ev­er, the main rea­son why Pacino’s take on Hof­fa will soon eclipse Nicholson’s in the pub­lic con­scious­ness is that the Jim­my Hof­fa we see in The Irish­man is more than the guy with the biggest balls in the room”, as DeVi­to once said. Pacino’s Hof­fa loves ice cream as much as he hates the Kennedys, has zero tol­er­ance for tar­di­ness (regard­less of traf­fic), and is shown to have an off switch.

Scors­ese and Steve Zail­lian show Hof­fa away from the cam­eras, his fol­low­ers, and his ene­mies. We see him as a father fig­ure, a friend, as a reg­u­lar per­son, rather than just an icon of Amer­i­can man­li­ness that Mamet, DeVi­to and Nichol­son pre­sent­ed in 1992. While Pacino’s per­for­mance will like­ly endure, Nicholson’s has already been resigned to the mar­gins of film history.

You might like

Accessibility Settings

Text

Applies the Open Dyslexic font, designed to improve readability for individuals with dyslexia.

Applies a more readable font throughout the website, improving readability.

Underlines links throughout the website, making them easier to distinguish.

Adjusts the font size for improved readability.

Visuals

Reduces animations and disables autoplaying videos across the website, reducing distractions and improving focus.

Reduces the colour saturation throughout the website to create a more soothing visual experience.

Increases the contrast of elements on the website, making text and interface elements easier to distinguish.