The story of Apocalypse Now’s controversial… | Little White Lies

The sto­ry of Apoc­a­lypse Now’s con­tro­ver­sial Cannes première

10 Aug 2019

Crowd of people at formal event, including men in suits and women in evening gowns, standing together and smiling.
Crowd of people at formal event, including men in suits and women in evening gowns, standing together and smiling.
Fran­cis Ford Cop­po­la caused an unprece­dent­ed stir when he unveiled his unfin­ished Viet­nam opus in 1979.

Fran­cis Ford Coppola’s Apoc­a­lypse Now received its world pre­mière at the 1979 Cannes Film Fes­ti­val, where, in an unprece­dent­ed move, it was screened as a work in progress” – the first time the fes­ti­val had select­ed an unfin­ished film in com­pe­ti­tion. And it was not the only prece­dent the film set on the Croisette that year.

Since his last vis­it to Cannes in 1974, when he had won the Palme d’Or for The Con­ver­sa­tion, Cop­po­la had been immersed in the leg­en­dar­i­ly long and dif­fi­cult shoot of his Viet­nam opus, fol­lowed by a marathon edit­ing process of the many hours of footage. Expec­ta­tions were high with­in the indus­try for the unveil­ing of the fin­ished film, and Gilles Jacob, who had been appoint­ed artis­tic direc­tor of Cannes in 1978, was keen to have it in com­pe­ti­tion at the fol­low­ing year’s festival.

He vis­it­ed Cop­po­la while he was in the edit­ing room and was excit­ed by the glimpses of footage he saw there, although the film­mak­er said there was lit­tle chance of it being ready for the 1979 fes­ti­val. How­ev­er, Jacob con­tin­ued to pur­sue the pos­si­bil­i­ty, and offered to screen it in any form Cop­po­la want­ed, even as an unfin­ished work.

Cop­po­la was ini­tial­ly reluc­tant to take the film to Cannes before the final edit was com­plete: he knew it was a risk because a neg­a­tive response at the fes­ti­val could dam­age the film’s future prospects. But Jacob con­tin­ued to press his case, offer­ing to waive the rule at the time which usu­al­ly pre­vent­ed past Palme d’Or win­ners from hav­ing anoth­er film play in com­pe­ti­tion for some time afterwards.

He also agreed to the many demands that would sub­se­quent­ly be made by Cop­po­la and the pro­duc­ers as a con­di­tion for the film’s entry, includ­ing the fes­ti­val fly­ing the prints across the Atlantic, and book­ing a lav­ish yacht for the direc­tor dur­ing his Cannes stay. It was a fraught process, and Jacob lived with the ongo­ing threat of the film being with­drawn by the mak­ers at any moment. But Apoc­a­lypse Now’s pres­ence in the Cannes com­pe­ti­tion also brought huge ben­e­fits to the fes­ti­val, draw­ing more media atten­tion than ever before thanks to the antic­i­pa­tion of see­ing the long-await­ed film.

Billed as Apoc­a­lypse Now (A Work in Progress)’ in fes­ti­val pub­lic­i­ty mate­ri­als, and run­ning for 139 min­utes, the film final­ly pre­miered on 19 May, 1979. It was pre­sent­ed with­out open­ing or clos­ing cred­its, reflect­ing its unfin­ished state, and was dif­fer­ent in many respects from the the­atri­cal cut Cop­po­la would release lat­er that year: accord­ing to the New York Times review of the Cannes cut, the orig­i­nal open­ing con­sist­ed of an impres­sion­is­tic series of sound effects lay­ered over hazy visuals.

The reviews were some­what mixed, with opin­ion most divid­ed over the last quar­ter of the film and Coppola’s choice of end­ing. But there was also enthu­si­asm for much of what was shown. Vari­ety declared it was worth the wait”, and the New York Times said: Each minute is so packed with detail that the col­lec­tive impact leaves the spec­ta­tor stunned.” Fol­low­ing the screen­ing, Cop­po­la stayed on at Cannes, social­is­ing on his yacht with Ser­gio Leone, among oth­ers, where he wait­ed to see if his pres­ence would be request­ed for the final awards cer­e­mo­ny. By now, many were tip­ping his film as a con­tender for the Palme.

But the jury were said to be less keen on Apoc­a­lypse Now. The 1979 jury pres­i­dent Françoise Sagan would lat­er give an inter­view in which she stat­ed that their great­est enthu­si­asm had actu­al­ly been for Volk­er Schlöndorff’s Die Blechtrom­mel (The Tin Drum), and that all the mem­bers of the jury, with the excep­tion of the festival’s for­mer artis­tic direc­tor Mau­rice Bessy, want­ed it to win the Palme as the fes­ti­val drew to a close. How­ev­er, the fes­ti­val pres­i­dent at the time, Robert Favre Le Bret, would sub­se­quent­ly make a star­tling inter­ven­tion on the issue.

Accord­ing to Sagan, he sum­moned her to a meet­ing in which he told her it was in the best inter­ests of Cannes for them to select Apoc­a­lypse Now as the win­ner instead, point­ing to the intense media cov­er­age gained by the fes­ti­val as a result of the film’s pres­ence. The next day, when the jury met for final delib­er­a­tions, Sagan was shocked when the oth­er mem­bers seemed to have been won round to Coppola’s film overnight, and she tem­porar­i­ly left the room in protest.

A com­pro­mise was even­tu­al­ly struck, with anoth­er vote result­ing in a tie between Apoc­a­lypse Now and The Tin Drum. And so, at the cer­e­mo­ny on 24 May, both Cop­po­la and Schlön­dorff were sum­moned on stage by Cather­ine Deneuve to be award­ed the Palme d’Or ex-aequo.

Favre Le Bret would deny Sagan’s alle­ga­tions at the time, but many years lat­er, Jacob acknowl­edged that the claims of influ­enc­ing the jury’s deci­sion were true. Accord­ing to him, Favre Le Bret and Bessy had spent the night before the award cer­e­mo­ny work­ing behind the scenes to per­suade the oth­er jurors on the mer­its of award­ing Apoc­a­lypse Now. He declared that the les­son he took from the expe­ri­ence was nev­er to inter­fere with the jury’s deci­sions: he would sit in on future dis­cus­sions, but not attempt to influ­ence the outcome.

Cop­po­la him­self had mixed feel­ings about the final result. The day after the awards, Jacob encoun­tered the direc­tor exit­ing a lim­ou­sine out­side the Carl­ton hotel; Cop­po­la shook his hand, but lament­ed: I only received half a Palme d’Or.” How­ev­er, even the shared suc­cess of the film would set anoth­er impor­tant prece­dent for Cannes.

The rule lim­it­ing past Palme win­ners from future com­pe­ti­tion slates was dis­card­ed alto­geth­er, and Coppola’s sec­ond Palme d’Or would be cit­ed by Jacob on many occa­sions when encour­ag­ing past win­ners to con­tin­ue enter­ing films in com­pe­ti­tion. And as the mul­ti­ple vic­to­ries by Michael Haneke and Bille August have sub­se­quent­ly shown, win­ning one Palme is no longer a bar­ri­er to win­ning another.

You might like