In praise of American Psycho – The capitalist… | Little White Lies

In Praise Of

In praise of Amer­i­can Psy­cho – The cap­i­tal­ist satire come full circle

21 Dec 2016

Words by Tom Williams

Two closeup faces looking intently at a computer screen.
Two closeup faces looking intently at a computer screen.
Bret Eas­t­on Ellis and Mary Harron’s caus­tic vision of 80s con­sumerism is sad­ly back en vogue.

I move away from the bum, notic­ing, instead, a lit­tle girl smok­ing a cig­a­rette, beg­ging for change out­side Trump Tow­er. Shoo,” I say.” This isn’t Don­ald Trump detail­ing his morn­ing com­mute, this is Patrick Bate­man – a vile con­struct from the mind of author Bret Eas­t­on Ellis as fea­tured in his epochal 1991 nov­el, Amer­i­can Psycho’.

A screen adap­tion arrived less than a decade lat­er care of direc­tor Mary Har­ron, hith­er­to best known for her true-life tale of NY pro­to-fem­i­nism, I Shot Andy Warhol. Both book and film offered a caus­tic, nos­tal­gic view of the go-go 80s, with Chris­t­ian Bale step­ping into the design­er loafers of psy­chot­ic cap­i­tal­ist cypher Bate­man, a slick-haired fig­ure­head of the con­sumerist night­mare as embod­ied by a man who owns a tow­er any Bond vil­lain would be jeal­ous of. That’s right: Don­ald Trump.

Giv­en Bateman’s obses­sion with the Trumps, it feels apro­pos that Amer­i­can Psy­cho should once more return to the cul­tur­al con­ver­sa­tion. The back­drop of the sto­ry is the fer­vour of Wall Street in the 1980s, a time when big busi­ness was thriv­ing and well-coifed men lust­ed for pow­er and sta­tus. Although the Trump of mod­ern times may be sell­ing him­self as a man of the peo­ple’, he remains an oily paragon of cap­i­tal­ism as sym­bol­ised by the fact that Trump Tow­er still stands tall in New York City.

Har­ron cap­tures the absur­di­ty of the swelling nar­cis­sis­tic val­ues which Ellis laid out with such pun­ish­ing pre­cise­ness in his source nov­el. His prose is a reflec­tion of the claim that soci­ety had become obsessed with sur­face val­ue. With this col­lec­tive van­i­ty came a greater attach­ment to prod­ucts, mat­ter, things, with focus attuned to mat­ters of look and price as opposed to actu­al con­tent – a fact made abun­dant­ly clear as we see Bate­man glide through his thor­ough morn­ing pam­per rou­tine as if he were con­duct­ing a symphony.

This excess of con­sumerism is satirised in the way that char­ac­ters’ sur­face traits are indis­tin­guish­able from one anoth­er, whether through their iden­ti­cal design­er suits or cos­met­ic tor­toise shell eye­wear. Although our mur­der­ous anti-hero appears iden­ti­cal to his peers, he is any­thing but that. He may snort the same cocaine and dine at the same restau­rants, but behind that slick façade he is repulsed and repulsive.

Nowhere is this con­trast clear­er than in his lux­u­ry apart­ment, which boasts a beau­ti­ful min­i­mal­ist décor – a décor the cam­era glides across with great care, as if not want­i­ng to mess with the Feng shui. Behind the brushed steel clos­ets and shiny white pan­els are sev­ered heads and weapons. On the sur­face the apart­ment is per­fect, but under­neath it is a mur­der house.

A man wearing a blue blindfold sits on the floor by a window.

This homi­ci­dal streak defines half of Bateman’s char­ac­ter. It results in sev­er­al acts of slash­er-esque gore: the mur­der­ing a dog; the throw­ing a chain­saw at a woman. It’s per­haps sur­pris­ing that a woman opt­ed to direct this film about a hate­ful male misog­y­nist whose whose predilec­tion for vis­cer­al vio­lence would seem to be more geared towards a male, almost fan­boy­ish audi­ence. But this per­spec­tive is what ele­vates the film above the the source mate­r­i­al. She ridicules of these atti­tudes, and cuts through the roman­tic view of Wall Street as an are­na for noble glad­i­a­to­r­i­al com­bat. Speak­ing to Dazed and Con­fused mag­a­zine in 2014, Har­ron said: I very much think [Amer­i­can Psy­cho is] a fem­i­nist film. It’s a satire about how men com­pete with each oth­er and how in this hyper-real uni­verse we cre­at­ed, women are even less impor­tant than your tan or your suit or where you summer.”

This ridicule is felt the strongest in the film’s infa­mous busi­ness card scene. Dri­ven to a mild pan­ic attack by the dif­fer­ent shades of let­ter­ing on his all-male colleague’s busi­ness cards, Bate­man and his cohorts are pre­sent­ed shal­low in the extreme. This black humour sits at the core of the film and is effec­tive because it nev­er strays into overt par­o­dy. Lat­er, we see Jared Leto’s face axed into obliv­ion by a venge­ful Bate­man in rela­tion to his rival’s abil­i­ty to gain a din­ner reser­va­tion. He does what we all feel.

The fun doesn’t stop here. Despite the sound­track com­pris­ing of quin­tes­sen­tial­ly 80s themed par­ty bangers, the lyrics of the tracks are com­plete­ly decon­tex­tu­alised in order to empha­sise the essen­tial­ly com­ic nature of the sto­ry. Leto’s beau­ti­ful face is smashed in (as it was in Fight Club) to the cheer­ful beat of Huey Lewis and The News’ Hip to be Square’. Sim­i­lar­ly, Chris de Burgh’s swoon­ing love song Lady in Red’ emanates from head­phones while pros­ti­tutes are being mur­dered. This dark con­trast is not only present here, but also in the evoca­tive cin­e­matog­ra­phy by Andrzej Seku­la, where the mono­chro­mat­ic style of Bateman’s apart­ment and work­place are con­trast­ed and taint­ed with the deep red of human blood.

On reflec­tion, this film still stings now, maybe even more so con­sid­er­ing the cur­rent geo-polit­i­cal cli­mate and the nor­mal­i­sa­tion of nar­cis­sism. The quin­tes­sen­tial male busi­ness­men is pre­sent­ed as being a clone of Don­ald Trump – they both rep­re­sent and idolise him. It is a dis­ap­point­ment that our soci­ety is even more dam­aged than the time the book was writ­ten. The satire is now real­i­ty. These mur­der­ous goons may have copied Trump, but we’ve elect­ed him. So say hi to your new neigh­bour. His name is Patrick Bateman.

You might like