The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar review – Dahl lovingly brought to life as only Anderson knows how

Review by Hannah Strong @thethirdhan

Directed by

Wes Anderson

Starring

Benedict Cumberbatch Ralph Fiennes Rupert Friend

Anticipation.

A short Wes Anderson film is still a Wes Anderson film.

Enjoyment.

Visually delightful take on one of Roald Dahl's more unusual works.

In Retrospect.

Hard to not wish it was longer, but a delightful addition all the same.

Wes Anderson adapts a Roald Dahl short story with his signature attention to detail and visual panache.

Back in June, while promoting Asteroid City, Wes Anderson caused quite the stir when he was asked about his new Roald Dahl adaptation with Netflix. After first pointing out that Netflix was the only place he could do the film since they acquired the rights to Dahl’s back catalogue in 2021 for $370 million, he then remarked that the streaming platform was “the perfect place to do it, because it’s not really a movie”. Undoubtedly Anderson meant nothing by the comment other than he prefers his films to be watched in the cinema rather than on a laptop or phone (at least on first run) but the comment was still deeply amusing for fans.

Perhaps in response, his second Dahl adaptation – from the short The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar – will receive a limited theatrical release before it hits streaming, and played Out of Competition at the Venice Film Festival. At a dinky 37 minutes, it’s his second shortest film after Hotel Chevalier, which was shot as a companion piece to The Darjeeling Limited. It’s also utterly charming, though we’ve come to expect as much from Anderson’s meticulously constructed technicolour worlds.

Working with a clutch of Wes first-timers as well as returning muse Ralph Fiennes (who here serves as Roald Dahl, narrating the film) Anderson tells the rather succinct story of a fabulously wealthy man (played by Benedict Cumberbatch) who cares for little beyond the accumulation of further wealth. One evening while snooping in the library of a friend’s home he discovers a book by Dr. ZZ Chatterjee (Dev Patel) that details his encounter with one Imdad Khan (Ben Kingsley): The Man Who Could See Without Using His Eyes.

This story-within-a-story is presented like a play, with intricate backdrops that illustrate Khan’s story of training with a mysterious Yogi (Richard Ayoade, who also appears as a doctor) in the depths of the Indian jungle. In this sense, the film is reminiscent of Asteroid City, but also brings to mind the home-staged plays of Margot Tenenbaum. The splendour of the set design reflects Dahl’s extraordinary imagination, but also indicates that Anderson puts as much care and attention to detail into a short film as a long one.

It’s not a surprise that Patel, Ayoade and Kingsley fit seamlessly into an Anderson picture (perhaps they’ll return for a longer project in future, though Anderson has indicated that they may pop up in the other Dahl shorts he is making for Netflix) and their direct-to-audience delivery – including stage directions – injects an element of deadpan humour. Fiennes makes perhaps a too flattering Dahl, with the first scene shot as a documentary at the writer’s Gipsy Cottage as he explains his process (Anderson previously stayed at the hut when he was working on Fantastic Mr. Fox, so it’s no surprise he recreates the surroundings lovingly) before beginning to tell the story direct-to-camera. There’s even a little Jarvis Cocker cameo, which is always nice.

Some critics considered the Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar to be Dahl’s humourous attempt to hit back at his detractors, who accused him of being a mean writer. Certainly it’s a rather saccharine narrative about a man whose miserliness is forever changed by a moment of spirituality (and the enduring exoticism of India is an issue within the source material that doesn’t exactly get corrected here) that doesn’t offer the same food for thought as Anderson’s features. It might even serve as a bit of a joke about the constant accusations his filmography faces, of his films being all style over substance. But for devotees, it’s a delightful little morsel, lovingly brought to life as only Anderson knows how, and illustrates his creativity when it comes to adaptation.

Little White Lies is committed to championing great movies and the talented people who make them.

By becoming a member you can support our independent journalism and receive exclusive essays, prints, weekly film recommendations and more.

Published 27 Sep 2023

Tags: Roald Dahl Wes Anderson

Anticipation.

A short Wes Anderson film is still a Wes Anderson film.

Enjoyment.

Visually delightful take on one of Roald Dahl's more unusual works.

In Retrospect.

Hard to not wish it was longer, but a delightful addition all the same.

Suggested For You

Asteroid City

By David Jenkins

The maestro returns, the patented formula tweaked to blissful perfection in this witty and deeply moving exploration of the tools that we produce to help us see beyond our everyday vision.

review LWLies Recommends

Isle of Dogs

By Hannah Strong

A humongous creative undertaking and a simple love of dogs combine for the most staggering achievement of Wes Anderson’s career.

review LWLies Recommends

Fantastic Mr Fox

By Matt Bochenski

Fantastic Mr Fox will renew your faith in a true American original.

review LWLies Recommends

Little White Lies Logo

About Little White Lies

Little White Lies was established in 2005 as a bi-monthly print magazine committed to championing great movies and the talented people who make them. Combining cutting-edge design, illustration and journalism, we’ve been described as being “at the vanguard of the independent publishing movement.” Our reviews feature a unique tripartite ranking system that captures the different aspects of the movie-going experience. We believe in Truth & Movies.

Editorial

Design